Autor

Dr. Guang Li, LL.M. (Cornell / Freiburg)

Salary Partner

Read More
Autor

Dr. Guang Li, LL.M. (Cornell / Freiburg)

Salary Partner

Read More

25. Januar 2023

streiTWert – 17 von 62 Insights

Arbitration Agreement under Chinese Law

  • In-depth analysis

In commercial transactions with Chinese companies, international arbitration is increasingly preferred as a method of dispute resolution. Compared to the traditional court litigation, arbitration has the advantages of professionalism, confidentiality, flexibility, finality and international enforceability. Parties to a contract wishing to choose arbitration as their method of dispute resolution shall enter into a valid arbitration agreement or agreed on a valid arbitration clause (jointly referred to as “arbitration agreement”). In practice, however, the arbitration agreement, jokingly referred to as the “midnight clause,” is often placed at the far end of a contract and severely underestimated. When a dispute arises, it may be invalid, unenforceable as well as cause unnecessary and significant costs and delay.

To give just one example, the following is an arbitration agreement in a recent Sino-German case with a disputed value of approx. 2 million USD handled by the author:

Dispute Resolution. Any controversy, dispute or claim between the Parties arising from this Agreement shall be finally settled through International Court of Arbitration in London, UK or Singapore applicable to such contracts. The place of dispute settlement shall be London, UK or Singapore. The verdicts would be in English.

Before discussing the substantive case merits, the mere procedural matters such as the governing law of the arbitration agreement, its validity, the subject matter(s) of arbitration, the arbitration institution, the arbitration rules, the place of arbitration, the language of arbitration, and how to resolve the conflict of jurisdiction already predetermine the complexity and costs of this case. Regrettably, similar arbitration agreements are not in the minority in practice.

In the following, the author summarizes some basic rules relating to commercial arbitration agreements under current Chinese law for reference when drafting or negotiating commercial arbitration agreements involving China. On July 30, 2021, China’s Ministry of Justice issued a Notice of Public Consultation on the Arbitration Law of China (Amendment) (Draft for Comments). As it has not yet been formally adopted into law, this article does not cover the contents of that draft for public comments.

I. Definition, form and required contents of arbitration agreement under Chinese law

  • Arbitration agreements include arbitration clauses included in contracts and other written agreements to request arbitration before or after a dispute arises.
  • Written arbitration agreements include agreements to request arbitration in the form of written contracts, letters and data messages (including telegrams, telex, faxes, electronic data interchange and e-mails).
  • An arbitration agreement MUST have the following contents:
    (i) An expression of intent to request arbitration;
    (ii) The subject matter(s) of arbitration; and
    (iii) the selected arbitration committee.
  • If an arbitration agreement does not include the arbitration matters or the arbitration committee or if such agreement is unclear, the arbitration agreement is invalid, unless the parties to the contract can reach a supplementary agreement in this regard.
  • The parties to a contract may agree in general terms that the matter to be arbitrated is a contractual dispute, e.g. “all disputes arising out of or in connection with this contract.” In this way disputes related to contract formation, validity, modification, assignment, performance, liability for breach of contract, interpretation, and termination can be recognized as the subject matter(s) of arbitration.
  • Given that the current Chinese Arbitration Law still only recognizes institutional arbitration, arbitration agreements drawn up in accordance with the Chinese Arbitration Law should contain the accurate name of the agreed arbitration institution in order to eliminate ambiguity and ensure the validity of the arbitration agreement. Once the specific arbitration institution is selected, the parties should use the model clause recommended by such institution and published on its official website as a starting point for drafting their own arbitration agreement.
  • If an arbitration agreement does not accurately state the name of the arbitration institution, but a specific arbitration institution can be identified, the arbitration institution shall be deemed to have been selected.
  • If an arbitration agreement only includes the arbitration rules applicable to the dispute, it is deemed that no arbitration institution has been agreed upon, unless the parties to the contract reach a supplementary agreement or the arbitration institution can be determined in accordance with the agreed arbitration rules.
  • If an arbitration agreement provides for arbitration by an arbitration institution in a particular place and there is only one arbitration institution in that place, that arbitration institution shall be deemed to be the agreed arbitration institution. If there are more than two arbitration institutions in that place, the parties to the contract may agree to choose one of them; if the parties to the contract cannot agree on the choice of arbitration institution, the arbitration agreement shall be invalid.
  • If the parties to a contract agree that a dispute may be submitted to an arbitration institution or to a court, the arbitration agreement shall be invalid, unless one party applies to the arbitration institution for arbitration and the other party fails to object within the statutory period (please refer to below).

II. Raising objection to validity of arbitration agreement

  • If there is any objection to the validity of the arbitration agreement, it shall be raised before the first hearing of the arbitral tribunal, and may request the arbitration committee to decide or request the People’s Court to make a ruling. If one party requests the arbitration committee to decide and the other party requests the People’s Court to make a ruling, the People’s Court shall make a ruling.

III. Independence of arbitration agreement

  • As an agreed method of dispute resolution, the arbitration agreement exists independently from the substantive contract, and the ineffectiveness, invalidity, nullity, revocation, modification, rescission or termination of the contract does not affect the validity of the arbitration agreement.

IV. Governing law of arbitration agreement

  • The parties to the contract may agree to choose the law applicable to the arbitration agreement. If the parties to the contract do not choose, the law of the place of the arbitration institution or the law of the place of arbitration shall apply.
  • Due to the above-mentioned independence of the arbitration agreement, the substantive governing law of the contract is not ipso facto also the procedural law applicable to its arbitration agreement. It is therefore advisable to either explicitly agree on the law applicable to the arbitration agreement or at least agree on the place of arbitration (please refer to below) in order to avoid future disputes over this issue.

V. Status of arbitration agreement

  • According to the Chinese Civil Code, as an agreed method of dispute resolution the arbitration agreement constitutes a substantial part of a contract. Changing the arbitration agreement in an offer will be treated as a substantial change and rejection of such offer by making a counteroffer.
  • Moreover, when using a form contract, the party providing the form contract should also take reasonable measures to draw the other party’s attention to the arbitration agreement in it that is unusual and of significant interest to the other party, and make explanations at the other party’s request. If the party providing the form contract fails to fulfill its obligation to prompt or explain, so that the other party does not pay attention to or understand the arbitration agreement in which it has a material interest, the other party might be able to claim that the arbitration agreement does not become the content of the contract.

VI. Other issues that should be addressed in arbitration agreement

  • Instead of the place of the hearing, the place of arbitration is the juridical home of the arbitration and should be agreed upon in the arbitration agreement. In the absence of an agreement to the contrary, the determination of the place of arbitration will determine the governing law with respect to the arbitration proceedings, such as the judicial supervision of the arbitration proceedings and the jurisdiction to apply for the setting aside of the arbitral award. In addition, whether the place of arbitration is in a member state of the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards may also affect the enforceability of the arbitral award in another country.
  • The number of arbitrators will have a direct impact on the cost, duration and quality of the arbitration proceedings. Depending on the value and complexity of the transaction, one or three arbitrators may be considered and agreed upon in the arbitration agreement.
  • The arbitration rules of certain major Chinese arbitration institutions provide that the Chinese language is presumed to be the language of arbitration in the absence of an express agreement on the arbitration language. Therefore, in order to avoid any ambiguity and potential disadvantages, the language of arbitration should be expressly agreed upon in the arbitration agreement. While agreeing on one or at most two language(s) of arbitration, it is possible to agree on the use of other language(s) for the submission of documents, etc., without translation.
  • While arbitration is private, under the Chinese Arbitration Law parties are under no statutory duty to keep the arbitration proceedings confidential. Therefore, if wished and unless already sufficiently provided for in the applicable arbitration rules, the confidentiality should be addressed in the arbitration agreement.
  • The Chinese Arbitration Law neither provides for how the costs and fees of arbitration proceedings will be allocated. Therefore, if wished and unless already sufficiently provided for in the applicable arbitration rules, the allocation of costs and fees (e.g. also including fees of inhouse counsels, external attorneys and service providers etc.) should be addressed in the arbitration agreement, e.g. “to be decided by the arbitral tribunal by considering the relative success of the parties on their claims, counterclaims and defenses.”
  • The parties may also agree on amicable negotiation before arbitration. However, if a binding condition precedent to arbitration is wished, the relevant clause should specify a reasonable but not too long period (e.g. 30 – 60 days) for such pre-arbitration negotiation and define the specific event triggering such period (e.g. a written request to negotiate). Otherwise, according to the current practice in China, the relevant disputes could be submitted to arbitration immediately without going through (the insufficiently specified) amicable negotiation as a first step.

In dieser Serie

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Doppelmandate: BGH klärt Fragen der Organbestellung im Konzern

19. October 2023

von Dr. Dirk Lorenz

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Massenverfahren in Deutschland – Die Verbandsklage kommt

19. June 2023

von Florian Lambracht

Technologie-, Medien & Kommunikationsrecht

AI product liability – moving ahead with a modernised legal regime

Katie Chandler, Philipp Behrendt and Christopher Bakier look at the EU's proposals to legislate for liability risks in AI products.

9. May 2023

von mehreren Autoren

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Vorschlag der Europäischen Kommission für eine neue Richtlinie über die Reparatur von Waren

13. April 2023

von mehreren Autoren

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Vorsicht, Lerngefahr!

Beratung zur Streitvermeidung und Streitlösung

28. March 2023

von Dr. Frank Koch

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Arbitration Agreement under Chinese Law

25. January 2023

von Dr. Guang Li, LL.M. (Cornell / Freiburg)

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

BGH: Uneingeschränkte Kontrolle kartellrechtlicher Schiedssprüche

24. January 2023

von mehreren Autoren

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Der Vorschlag der Europäischen Kommission zur Bauproduktenverordnung – Es muss nachgebessert werden!

Hinweis zum Aufsatz von Christine Simon-Wiehl in Zeitschrift für Product Compliance (ZfPC) 05/2022, 198 ff.

13. January 2023

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Gerichtsverhandlung per Videokonferenz soll Standard werden

13. December 2022

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

BGH zur Ausländersicherheit nach dem Brexit

9. December 2022

von Peter Bert, lic.oec.int.

Produktsicherheit & Produkthaftung

Entwurf der EU-Kommission für eine neue Produkthaftungsrichtlinie in der EU

Die Europäische Kommission hat am 28. September 2022 neben dem Vorschlag für eine Richtlinie über KI-Haftung ihren mit Spannung erwarteten Entwurf für eine neue Produkthaftungsrichtlinie veröffentlicht. Diese Neuerungen gibt es.

25. November 2022

von David Hilger, LL.M. (Bilbao)

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Strukturvorgaben im Zivilprozess: Neues aus dem Labor

10. November 2022

von Peter Bert, lic.oec.int.

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Moderner streiten!

Experimente beim digitalen Zivilprozess sind schön und gut – doch es fehlt ein System

29. September 2022

von Peter Bert, lic.oec.int.

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

BGH beschränkt Bekanntmachungspflichten in der Einladung zur Hauptversammlung

22. September 2022

von Dr. Dirk Lorenz

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Haager Urteilsübereinkommen: Start am 1. September 2023

6. September 2022

von Peter Bert, lic.oec.int.

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Schiedsklauseln in Gesellschaftsverträgen

30. August 2022

von Dr. Carsten Müller, LL.M., Maître en Droit

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Climate Change Litigation – Klimawandel vor den ordentlichen Gerichten

24. August 2022

eCommerce & Marketplaces

eCommerce: Muss ein Händler stets über Herstellergarantien informieren? – EuGH mit klarem „Jein“

Unstrittig: Herstellergarantien können den Abverkauf von Waren erhöhen und zur Kundenbindung beitragen. Aber sind Online-Händler auch verpflichtet, ihre Kunden darüber zu informieren, wenn es solche Garantien gibt?

5. October 2022

von Johannes Raue, Henry Richard Lauf

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Der BGH und die Business Judgement Rule

streiTWert

19. May 2022

von Dr. Dirk Lorenz

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Schmerzensgeld: BGH verwirft die sog. taggenaue Berechnung

streiTWert

5. May 2022

von Florian Lambracht

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

BGH zum Verhältnis von selbstständigem Beweisverfahren und Schiedsgutachten

streiTWert

31. March 2022

von Peter Bert, lic.oec.int.

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

LG Frankfurt: Keine Haftung der BaFin für Verluste von Wirecard-Aktionären

streiTWert

24. January 2022

von Matthias Swiderski, LL.M.

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Wie „anwenderfreundlich“ wird die Umsetzung der Verbandsklage-Richtlinie?

streiTWert

7. December 2021

von Florian Lambracht

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

EU-Richtlinie über Verbandsklagen: Offene Fragen und Umsetzungsspielräume

streiTWert – Am 24.12.2020 ist die Verbandsklage-Richtlinie in Kraft getreten

18. November 2021

von Matthias Swiderski, LL.M.

Coronavirus

Wenn Corona dazwischenkommt: Wer bleibt auf den Kosten sitzen?

streiTWert – Entscheidung des LG Hamburg über Stornierungskosten bei Veranstaltungen

22. September 2021

von Donata Freiin von Enzberg, LL.M., Kerstin Bär, LL.M. (Bristol, UK)

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

BGH: Wie viel Arzthaftung steckt in der Produkthaftung?

streiTWert

9. September 2021

von Florian Lambracht

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

BGH – Keine Verwechslungsgefahr bei der Firmenbezeichnung „partners“

streiTWert

23. August 2021

von Kolja Helms

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

EuGH: Keine Produkthaftung für falsche Gesundheitstipps in einer Zeitung

streiTWert

13. August 2021

von Dr. Lena Niehoff

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Newsflash – Neues Produktsicherheitsgesetz in Kraft

streiTWert

5. August 2021

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Neues aus Brüssel zu Lugano und Den Haag

streiTWert

28. July 2021

von Peter Bert, lic.oec.int.

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Gesetz zur Modernisierung des Personengesellschaftsrechts ist beschlossene Sache

streiTWert

15. July 2021

von Kolja Helms

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

15 Monate Pandemie - Covid19 und „Force Majeure” nochmals betrachtet

streiTWert

8. July 2021

von Harald Bechteler

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

BGH: Impressum einer Webseite kann Gerichtsstand in Deutschland begründen

streiTWert

8. June 2021

von Peter Bert, lic.oec.int.

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Kommen die „Commercial Courts“ in Deutschland?

streiTWert

28. May 2021

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

„Commercial Courts“ in Deutschland: Sind aller guten Dinge vier?

streiTWert

17. May 2021

von Peter Bert, lic.oec.int.

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Die Verpflichtung zur Leistung einer Prozesskostensicherheit nach § 110 ZPO

streiTWert – Ein vielfach unterschätzter Kostenpunkt für im Ausland ansässige Klageparteien?

1. September 2021

von Frank J. Weck, LL.M.

Call To Action Arrow Image

Newsletter-Anmeldung

Wählen Sie aus unserem Angebot Ihre Interessen aus!

Jetzt abonnieren
Jetzt abonnieren

Related Insights

Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Non-Competition Agreement under Chinese Employment Law Regime

27. Januar 2023
In-depth analysis

von Dr. Guang Li, LL.M. (Cornell / Freiburg)

Klicken Sie hier für Details
Rechtsstreitigkeiten & Investigations

Changzhou, Jiangsu Province Releases Ten Typical Cases of Labour Dispute in 2019

28. Januar 2020

von Dr. Guang Li, LL.M. (Cornell / Freiburg)

Klicken Sie hier für Details
Coronavirus

Chinese Employment Law Issues in Dealing with Coronavirus Infections

28. Januar 2020

von Dr. Guang Li, LL.M. (Cornell / Freiburg)

Klicken Sie hier für Details