Autor
Georgina Jones

Georgina Jones

Senior Associate

Read More
Autor
Georgina Jones

Georgina Jones

Senior Associate

Read More

16. Juni 2020

Disputes Quick Read – 21 von 24 Insights

Disputes Quick Read: Will the civil justice system change forever post COVID-19?

  • QUICK READ

The Civil Justice Council has published a "rapid" review examining the impact of the changes introduced to the civil justice system as a result of COVID-19. This was done to identify areas that need to be addressed in the short to medium term, and to inform a longer term review. Key observations include:

  • COVID-19 has exacerbated the pre-existing issue of underinvestment in the court system, particularly with regard to the use of technology. 
  • There has been a reduction in the availability and accessibility of legal advice (disproportionately affecting those on lower incomes).
  • There has been a high rate of adjournments, and managing that back log is an area of real concern.
  • The majority of remote hearings have related to higher value claims and have not involved litigants in person.
  • There is tentative support for reserving remote hearings for matters where the outcome is less contested or interlocutory in nature, and for hearings where both parties are represented.
  • There has been a mixed experience in the higher and lower courts regarding the impact on open justice. Although journalists and court reporters have been able to access hearings which they wished to attend, this has been patchier where members of the public are concerned.

Broadly speaking, professional court users are satisfied with the remote hearings experience. Video hearings are generally preferred to audio-only hearings, due to the more effective communication afforded by the former's visual element.

In terms of improving the remote hearing experience, review participants made the following recommendations:

  • providing greater granularity and consistency in the guidance issued by different courts regarding the criteria for adjournments and use of remote hearings
  • issuing timely notice to court users regarding remote hearings, which should include all necessary information regarding the mode of hearing, access details and preparation of e-bundles
  • increasing the use of breaks in order to allow legal teams to communicate and take instructions from clients, as well as to enable settlement discussions with the other side
  • investing in better infrastructure to support the preparation and submission of e-bundles and sharing of documents during hearings.

On the long term viability of remote hearings, unsurprisingly, the review has concluded that a better quantity and quality of data is needed to understand their impact. The review identifies several urgent areas for evaluation, including:

  • the impact of remote hearings on outcomes
  • a cost-benefit analysis of remote hearings, and
  • the impact on open justice.

So, although it's too early to say whether the way justice is accessed will change forever, the current trend seems to be towards being open to new ideas and committed to using recent experiences to inform future practices.

In dieser Serie

Disputes & Investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Care required when drafting SPA claim notices

QUICK READ

von Mehrere Autoren

Disputes & Investigations

Disputes Quick Read: The latest on Unexplained Wealth Orders

QUICK READ

von Mehrere Autoren

Disputes & Investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Tomlin Orders – ensuring the confidentiality of settlement terms

QUICK READ

von Mehrere Autoren

Disputes & Investigations

Disputes quick read: climate change activism by litigation

von Mehrere Autoren

Disputes & Investigations

Disputes quick read: pilot error?

von Andrew Howell

Disputes & Investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Privilege waiver warning

QUICK READ

von Tim Strong, Georgina Jones

Call To Action Arrow Image

Newsletter-Anmeldung

Wählen Sie aus unserem Angebot Ihre Interessen aus!

Jetzt abonnieren
Jetzt abonnieren

Related Insights

Disputes & Investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Privilege lost in the EU post-Brexit (with exceptions)

23. November 2020
Quick read

von Andrew Howell und Georgina Jones

Klicken Sie hier für Details
tunnel
Disputes & Investigations

FRC's Annual Enforcement Review 2020 – our thoughts

11. August 2020
IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS

von Andrew Howell und Georgina Jones

Klicken Sie hier für Details
inside-office-building
Disputes & Investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Privilege waiver warning

2. Juli 2020
QUICK READ

von Tim Strong und Georgina Jones

Klicken Sie hier für Details