Autoren
Shireen Shaikh

Shireen Shaikh

Senior Professional Support Lawyer

Read More
kathryn clapp

Kathryn Clapp

Senior Professional Support Lawyer

Read More
Autoren
Shireen Shaikh

Shireen Shaikh

Senior Professional Support Lawyer

Read More
kathryn clapp

Kathryn Clapp

Senior Professional Support Lawyer

Read More

17. Juni 2020

Law at Work - June 2020 – 3 von 5 Insights

Not always a remedy where confidentiality clause breached

Duchy Farm Kennels v Steels [2020] EWHC 1208 (QB)

Why care

It has become standard practice for employers to include a confidentiality clause in a settlement agreement, obliging the employee to keep the fact and contents of a settlement agreement confidential. It makes commercial sense for employers not to want the fact or terms of any severance deals to become common knowledge lest others in the workplace see them as a soft touch or else try to jump on a 'gravy train'. If the employee breaches confidentiality, the agreement sometimes specifies that the employer will be entitled to withhold some or all of the payment. But will the employer always have a remedy if it seeks to rely on such a clause? It would appear not from the High Court case reported below; a lot will depend on the drafting and the particular context.

The case

Mr Steels waived his claims against Duchy Farms Kennels through Acas using a COT3. It contained a confidentiality clause, requiring Mr Steels to keep the fact and terms of the agreement strictly confidential. When Mr Steels disclosed the settlement to another employee, Duchy Farms withheld the final instalments of the payment and sought a declaration that the final sums were not recoverable due to the employee's breach. The court held that Duchy Farms was not entitled to withhold the final instalments. On the facts, and having regard to the drafting of the agreement, confidentiality was not a condition of the agreement, it did not go the heart of it. While the court accepted, in principle, that an employee breaching confidentiality could be liable in damages where the disclosure generated 'copy-cat unmeritorious claims', this was not the case here. Neither had the employer been able to show anything 'special' about the case which demonstrated that confidentiality was of paramount importance.

What to take away

If protecting confidentiality is crucial to the employer, it should make this clear by framing the term as a condition of the agreement. It should also set out the consequences of breach (usually withholding part of the settlement monies). Ideally, it should also be able to pinpoint a specific consideration, beyond not generally wanting its approach to settlement being known, which makes confidentiality paramount. In some cases, where there is scope for significant reputational damage, or else if the parties are well-known, it will be obvious that there are 'special circumstances'. However, in the majority of cases the employer will generally just want to keep its severance deals private and should be aware that it may not always have an effective remedy in such cases where it includes a generic clause.

In dieser Serie

Employment, Pensions & Mobility

Pensions – always on the agenda

QUICK READ

von Mehrere Autoren

Employment, Pensions & Mobility

TUPE: beneficial changes to contract void

QUICK READ

von Shireen Shaikh, Kathryn Clapp

Employment, Pensions & Mobility

Law at Work: Hot topics - June 2020

QUICK READ

von Shireen Shaikh, Kathryn Clapp

Call To Action Arrow Image

Newsletter-Anmeldung

Wählen Sie aus unserem Angebot Ihre Interessen aus!

Jetzt abonnieren
Jetzt abonnieren

Related Insights

people walking
Employment, Pensions & Mobility

Wake-up call to 'middleman' businesses introducing individuals to end-users

19. Oktober 2020

von Shireen Shaikh

Klicken Sie hier für Details
people walking
Employment, Pensions & Mobility

New Government Job Support Scheme

24. September 2020
QUICK READ

von Paul Callaghan und Shireen Shaikh

Klicken Sie hier für Details
waiting room
Employment, Pensions & Mobility

No requirement for employer to re-engage employee following unfair dismissal where lack of trust and confidence in employee's capability

Kelly v PGA European Tour

16. September 2020
QUICK READ

von Kathryn Clapp

Klicken Sie hier für Details