Auteur

Edward Spencer

Senior counsel

Read More
Auteur

Edward Spencer

Senior counsel

Read More

13 septembre 2021

Disputes Quick Read – 43 de 87 Publications

Disputes Quick Read: Key changes to the Disclosure Pilot Scheme

  • Quick read

On 29 July 2021, the Disclosure Working Group announced the latest in a series of updates to the Disclosure Pilot Scheme (DPS).

This scheme was originally launched on 1 January 2019 to limit the scope of disclosure to what is reasonable and proportionate. The relevant practice direction, an increasingly familiar sight to litigators, is PD51U which governs disclosure in the Business and Property Courts. 

These changes were initially suggested on 5 February 2021 and submitted to the Civil Procedure Rules Committee for consideration on 9 July 2021. They should receive final approval in the coming months.

What are the key changes to the Disclosure Pilot Scheme?

Extending the DPS

  • The extension of the DPS until 31 December 2022, four years from its launch, to allow time for implementing and applying these updates, and for any feedback on the DPS.

Creating a system for "Less Complex Claims" within the pilot

  • This new category caters to claims which, by their nature, value, complexity and the likely volume of Extended Disclosure, are less likely to benefit from the full procedural requirements of PD51U.
  • Less Complex Claims will include the majority of claims worth less than £500,000, and claims will receive this designation through either an agreement of the parties or from the court.
  • Only Models A, B and D of Extended Disclosure will be available to Less Complex Claims, with Models A and B requiring neither identification of Issues for Disclosure nor a Disclosure Review Document. Appendix 5 also specifies limiting the number of issues for disclosure to five and keeping them brief, and drafting to a high level of abstraction.
  • Despite the introduction of this new system, it still is important in each case to consider whether the matter would be more suited to the Shorter Trials Scheme.
  • Further guidance on a simplified version of the Disclosure Review Document for Less Complex Claims is available in Appendices 6 and 7. 

Recognising that disclosure in multi-party claims needs a bespoke approach for each case

  • Paragraph 13.5 allows disclosing parties in multi-party cases to decide which parties should receive disclosed documents. If it's not possible to reach agreement, Disclosure Guidance can be sought or an application for directions made.
  • This is a welcome change within an area subject to complaints over the difficulty of reaching agreement between multiple parties, particularly in cases where some of the issues do not apply to all the parties involved. 

Changing the category C and D models of disclosure

  • To simplify the process for agreeing lists, the Disclosure Working Group updated these models of disclosure.
  • Model C is now called "Disclosure of particular documents or narrow classes of documents" not "Request-led search-based disclosure", reflecting the focused scope for disclosure under this model. 
  • It will also be easier to exclude narrative documents under Model D, potentially reducing the costs that are currently incurred when excluding documents. This change, reflected in paragraph 8.3, encourages parties to take reasonable steps to exclude narrative documents where it is reasonable and proportionate to do so. 
  • One of the main purposes of this particular update is to discourage the use of Model C, which the Disclosure Working Group believes is currently used excessively. 

De-emphasising the need for a hearing 

  • The revised wording of paragraph 11 removes all mention of the "Disclosure Guidance Hearings" in favour of more general references to "Disclosure Guidance" and conditional "hearings".
  • As with all the above, the hope is that a reduced emphasis on the need for hearings will streamline the DPS, making it and the overall disclosure process more efficient.

The community will likely welcome these changes. They show the Working Group’s openness to modifying the DPS to ensure that, when the scheme finally comes to an end, the changes have been thoroughly road-tested and are workable, while still achieving the reform needed to make disclosure a more manageable and effective process.

Find out more

You can read the full details of the changes here. To discuss the issues raised in this article in more detail, please reach out to a member of our Disputes & Investigations team.

Dans cette série

Résolution des litiges

New SFO Director announces bold plans to tackle fraud

21 March 2024

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

What are the litigation trends for 2024?

1 February 2024

par Katie Chandler, Emma Allen

Résolution des litiges

ClientEarth v FCA: Challenging Regulator Decisions

12 February 2024

par Tim Strong, Nicole Baldev

Résolution des litiges

The use of AI in Trial Witness Statements post-PD 57AC

23 October 2023

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

Failure to prevent fraud – a new offence?

14 August 2023

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

Supreme Court rules that APP fraud victims cannot rely on Quincecare Duty

4 August 2023

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: ClientEarth refused permission to pursue directors of Shell

1 June 2023

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

CJC costs review – what will change?

1 June 2023

par James Bryden, Helen Robinson

Résolution des litiges

Embargoed judgments – dos and don'ts

16 May 2023

par Stephanie High

Cryptoactifs, blockchain et technologie des registres distribués (DLT) et projets Web 3.0

Disputes Quick Read: New obligations on cryptobusinesses to report under the UK sanctions regime

9 August 2022

par Nick Maday

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: New gateway for serving Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust orders out of the jurisdiction

Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts

28 July 2022

par Emma Allen, Samantha Brendish

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: Care required when drafting SPA claim notices

23 September 2020

par plusieurs auteurs

Coronavirus

Disputes Quick Read: COVID-19 and supply chain disruption – key issues

9 April 2020

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: Tomlin Orders – ensuring the confidentiality of settlement terms

27 April 2020

par plusieurs auteurs

Coronavirus

Disputes Quick Read: Embracing remote hearings – the experience to date

26 March 2020

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

Disputes quick read: pilot error?

13 February 2020

par Andrew Howell

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: Dealing in crypto? Be careful what you call it

7 April 2022

par plusieurs auteurs

Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe

Related Insights

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: Disclosure - What information can be redacted?

25 juillet 2022
Briefing

par Edward Spencer

Cliquer ici pour en savoir plus
Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: Disclosure Pilot Scheme – here to stay

21 juillet 2022
Quick read

par Edward Spencer

Cliquer ici pour en savoir plus
Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: an important reminder of the duty to disclose electronic documents in native format

13 juin 2022
Briefing

par Edward Spencer

Cliquer ici pour en savoir plus