13 juin 2022
Disputes Quick Read – 58 de 57 Publications
Disputes Quick Read: an important reminder of the duty to disclose electronic documents in native format
In Veasey v Macdougall and others [2022] EWHC 864 (Ch) the court partly granted applications seeking disclosure of additional documents (under PD 51U.17 and PD 51U.18) by the petitioner and two respondents in the context of an unfair prejudice petition.
The judgment reiterates the obligation, unless otherwise ordered or agreed, for electronic documents to be disclosed in native format (PD 51U.13).
In this case, the petitioner was required to make a witness statement to explain what had happened, including the extent to which he had been advised by solicitors of his obligations.
A reminder of the disclosure obligation under PD 51U.13
"13. Production of documents
13.1 Save where otherwise agreed or ordered, a party shall produce -
(1) disclosable electronic documents to the other parties by providing electronic copies in the documents’ native format, in a manner which preserves metadata;
...
13.2 Electronic documents should generally be provided in the form which allows the party receiving the documents the same ability to access, search, review and display the documents (including metadata) as the party providing them."
The petitioner's disclosure included text messages. The text messages which were considered relevant were copied into a new standalone document and uploaded to the e-disclosure document review platform.
That step, of creating a new document, breached PD 51U.13.1(1) and 13.2 as the text messages were not provided in native form and the metadata was not preserved. The petitioner's reasoning was that this method of creating a new document avoided "having to redact over 1,000 pages of personal and irrelevant material which is disproportionate in the circumstances.". They added "the document uploaded to the platform containing the relevant texts does not have the original meta-data in relation to the messages but this can be provided under separate cover should you require it.''
However, the decision to balance costs and the obligation to provide documents in the format set out in the CPR did not convince the judge. While the effort to reduce costs and the offer to provide metadata separately was noted, the judge (HHJ Matthews) stated that the fact remained that the petitioner did not comply with the rules. He said:
"Electronic disclosure is not simply a recent “add-on” to the original disclosure regime. On the contrary, in the modern business world, and under CPR Practice Direction 51U, it is most of it. Producing copies of electronic documents, or simply just printed out versions of them, gives less information (and sometimes different information) compared to the original native versions. Mistakes do occur in copying. It is not unknown for electronic documents, like paper documents, to be tampered with (though there is no suggestion of that here). It is therefore important that the rules specially formulated for electronic disclosure, in particular about disclosing electronic documents in native format, are adhered to."
This highlights the importance of complying with the rules even in cases involving slightly more unusual, or seemingly less straightforward to produce, electronic documents such as text messages or electronic messages other than email.
Parties to litigation cannot ignore the rules simply for the ease of production or to save costs.
A robust and defensible collection process, with data of all types being extracted and processed in a forensically sound way, isn’t a corner to be cut. Before taking any step which is not in full compliance with the rules, you should seek to reach agreement with the other side as to an appropriate approach.
Solicitors' duties
When the respondent requested native versions of two text messages whose timing was considered relevant, the petitioner's solicitors indicated that they were unable to locate native copies. They indicated in fact they had never had the documents in native format and only had possession of screenshots of the text messages.
The judge reminded the petitioner's solicitors of the importance of the following duties:
- To explain the importance of document preservation and their clients' duty to ensure that documents are preserved and electronic documents "properly safeguarded".
- To take control of the original versions of the disclosure documents. He accepted that "exceptional circumstances" might require the solicitors to take copies in the first instance. However, they must be complete copies (including metadata), and the solicitors must satisfy themselves that they are accurate and complete.
The judge decided that there had clearly been a failure to comply with the disclosure order. Given the difficulties and confusion caused, it was "entirely reasonable and proportionate" that the petitioner should make a witness statement supported by a statement of truth, regarding what had happened. The statement should either evidence that he had complied, or that it was impossible for him fully to comply, taking into account his own actions and the extent to which he was advised by solicitors of his obligations.
Dans cette série
Disputes Quick Read: ClientEarth v Shell – climate change litigation shifts focus to UK companies
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: High Court rules that failure to provide adequate data security is not a positive act
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: Key changes to the Disclosure Pilot Scheme
par Edward Spencer
Disputes Quick Read: Judicial Review and Courts Bill – unpacking the UK government's proposed amendments
par Stephanie High
Disputes Quick Read: Will litigants be compelled to participate in alternative dispute resolution?
Disputes Quick Read: Freezing injunctions – maximum custodial sentence imposed for breach
Disputes Quick Read: The online future of civil justice – the end of the legal profession or the end of legal drudgery?
par Jessica Thomas
Disputes Quick Read: Will the courts change forever post-COVID?
par David de Ferrars
Disputes Quick Read: One Blackfriars administrators cleared of misfeasance
par Stephen O'Grady
Disputes Quick Read: Not your prerogative – the Independent Review of Administrative Law reports its recommendations on judicial review
par Stephanie High
Disputes Quick Read: Amendments to the Disclosure Pilot Scheme – a step in the right direction
Disputes Quick Read: UK Supreme Court rules on the territorial extent of the SFO's powers
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: No dropping anchor – parent company liability for environmental claims
Disputes Quick Read: What lawyers need to know about new witness statement preparation rules
par Stephanie High
Disputes Quick Read: Should you still choose the English courts to have jurisdiction in your international contracts after Brexit?
par Tim Strong
Disputes Quick Read: Privilege lost in the EU post-Brexit (with exceptions)
Disputes Quick Read: Law on interest applicable to US dollar awards reaffirmed
Disputes Quick Read: Care required when drafting SPA claim notices
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: Why the modernised LCIA rules are a welcome update
par Nick Storrs
Disputes Quick Read: The importance of proper service
par Edward Spencer
Disputes quick read: Mandatory changes to Statements of Truth
par Katie Chandler
Disputes Quick Read: The latest on Unexplained Wealth Orders
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: COVID-19 and supply chain disruption – key issues
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: High Court orders parties to explore options for 5-week remote trial
Disputes Quick Read: Tomlin Orders – ensuring the confidentiality of settlement terms
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: UK's OFSI fines Standard Chartered Bank £20 million for sanctions breaches
par Stephanie High
Disputes Quick Read: A different approach to witness evidence
par James Bryden
Disputes Quick Read: Coronavirus - a growth in virtual courts?
par Stuart Broom
Disputes Quick Read: Embracing remote hearings – the experience to date
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes quick read: climate change activism by litigation
par Tim Strong, Andrew Howell
Disputes Quick Read: Commercial Court's arbitral power shift
par Andrew Howell
Disputes Quick Read: Court stays evictions during COVID-19 – is this lawful?
par Georgina Jones
Disputes Quick Read: Will the civil justice system change forever post COVID-19?
par Georgina Jones
Disputes Quick Read: Privilege waiver warning
par Tim Strong, Georgina Jones
Disputes Quick Read: Retailers reign supreme in Visa and Mastercard proceedings
Disputes Quick Read: Scope of duty and the SAAMCo counterfactual following Manchester Building Society
Disputes Quick Read: Facilitating transactions in cryptoassets - Lord Leggatt and the point of commercial law
par Stuart Broom
Disputes Quick Read: Privy Council clarifies the law on freezing injunctions in aid of foreign proceedings
par Katie Chandler
Disputes Quick Read: Climate change litigation – what's the latest?
par Tim Strong, Jessica Thomas
Disputes Quick Read: Court decisions on the Disclosure Pilot Scheme – the 2021 roundup
Disputes Quick Read: Assumption of responsibility - tax schemes and investors
Don't lose your keys: Bitcoin developers do not have a duty to assist owners in recovering lost cryptocurrency
Disputes Quick Read: Dealing in crypto? Be careful what you call it
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: ENRC prevails in claim against former solicitor
Disputes Quick Read: Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 – now in force
par Stephanie High
Disputes Quick Read: what claims exist when a smart contract is breached?
par Emma Allen
Disputes Quick Read: Disclosure Pilot Scheme – here to stay
par Edward Spencer
Disputes Quick Read: Climate change litigation – successful challenge to government's Net Zero Strategy
Disputes Quick Read: Defining the duty - the limits of the responsibility assumed by professionals
par Stuart Broom
Disputes Quick Read: New gateway for serving Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust orders out of the jurisdiction
Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts
Disputes Quick Read: New obligations on cryptobusinesses to report under the UK sanctions regime
par Nick Maday, Katie Fry-Paul
Related Insights
Disputes Quick Read: Disclosure - What information can be redacted?
par Edward Spencer et Lizzie Hancock
Disputes Quick Read: Disclosure Pilot Scheme – here to stay
par Edward Spencer
Disputes Quick Read: Court decisions on the Disclosure Pilot Scheme – the 2021 roundup
par Edward Spencer et Natalia Faekova