Auteurs

Katie Chandler

Associé

Read More

Samantha Brendish

Collaborateur senior

Read More
Auteurs

Katie Chandler

Associé

Read More

Samantha Brendish

Collaborateur senior

Read More

17 octobre 2023

Disputes Quick Read – 8 de 87 Publications

CAT to hear the first application for a collective settlement approval order

  • Quick read

In a procedural first that will be of great interest to the class action market, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) will be asked to approve a settlement in an opt-out collective action (relating to car delivery charges) later this year.  

Background to collective proceedings orders

The collective proceedings order regime for competition damages actions was established in 2015 and allows such cases to be brought on either an "opt-in" or "opt-out" basis. Unless they expressly choose to opt-out, all members of the class upon whose behalf the action is brought are party to opt-out proceedings, whereas any class member who wishes to be part of opt-in proceedings has to actively choose to join them. Collective proceedings must be commenced by a person who proposes to be the representative in those proceedings, albeit they do not have to be a class member themselves (as long as the CAT is satisfied that it is just and reasonable for them to be the class representative). 

Crucially, in order for any case to proceed as a collective action, it has to be certified by the CAT by way of a collective proceedings order. As part of that process, the CAT will decide whether the proceedings in question should proceed as a collective action at all. Claims are eligible for inclusion in collective proceedings only if the CAT considers that they raise the same, similar or related issues of fact or law and are suitable to be brought in collective proceedings. The CAT will also need to decide whether any collective proceedings order should be made on opt-in or opt-out basis which involves a consideration of:

  • the strength of the claims
  • whether it is practicable for the proceedings to be brought as opt-in collective proceedings, having regard to all the circumstances, including the estimated amount of damages that individual class members may recover.

Settlement of collective proceedings 

Collective proceedings orders also raise interesting questions around settlement and the procedure differs depending on whether the proceedings are opt-in (where the CAT's approval is not required) or opt-out (where it is).  That is because in opt-in proceedings every represented class member would have been identified and in theory able to give instructions to the class representative. However, in relation to opt-out proceedings, not every class member will have been identified and so the CAT's approval is required for any settlement because it would affect the interests of all class members. If a collective settlement approval order is made, that settlement would then bind all UK-domiciled class members who have not opted out to the terms of the settlement. However class members not domiciled in the UK must actively opt into the settlement. 

In deciding whether to make a collective settlement approval order, the Tribunal will consider whether the settlement is "just and reasonable" for the class members, having regard to a number of factors, including:

  • The amount and terms of the settlement.
  • The number of estimated number of persons likely to be entitled to a share of the settlement. 
  • The likelihood of judgment being obtained in collective proceedings for an amount significantly in excess of the amount of the settlement size of the class covered by the settlement.
  • The likely duration and costs of the collective proceedings if they proceeded to trial.

The CAT's decision and how it deals with these considerations when hearing the application in early December will therefore be of particular interest to competition litigators.

Dans cette série

Résolution des litiges

New SFO Director announces bold plans to tackle fraud

21 March 2024

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

What are the litigation trends for 2024?

1 February 2024

par Katie Chandler, Emma Allen

Résolution des litiges

ClientEarth v FCA: Challenging Regulator Decisions

12 February 2024

par Tim Strong, Nicole Baldev

Résolution des litiges

The use of AI in Trial Witness Statements post-PD 57AC

23 October 2023

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

Failure to prevent fraud – a new offence?

14 August 2023

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

Supreme Court rules that APP fraud victims cannot rely on Quincecare Duty

4 August 2023

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: ClientEarth refused permission to pursue directors of Shell

1 June 2023

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

CJC costs review – what will change?

1 June 2023

par James Bryden, Helen Robinson

Résolution des litiges

Embargoed judgments – dos and don'ts

16 May 2023

par Stephanie High

Cryptoactifs, blockchain et technologie des registres distribués (DLT) et projets Web 3.0

Disputes Quick Read: New obligations on cryptobusinesses to report under the UK sanctions regime

9 August 2022

par Nick Maday

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: New gateway for serving Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust orders out of the jurisdiction

Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts

28 July 2022

par Emma Allen, Samantha Brendish

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: Care required when drafting SPA claim notices

23 September 2020

par plusieurs auteurs

Coronavirus

Disputes Quick Read: COVID-19 and supply chain disruption – key issues

9 April 2020

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: Tomlin Orders – ensuring the confidentiality of settlement terms

27 April 2020

par plusieurs auteurs

Coronavirus

Disputes Quick Read: Embracing remote hearings – the experience to date

26 March 2020

par plusieurs auteurs

Résolution des litiges

Disputes quick read: pilot error?

13 February 2020

par Andrew Howell

Résolution des litiges

Disputes Quick Read: Dealing in crypto? Be careful what you call it

7 April 2022

par plusieurs auteurs

Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe

Related Insights

Responsabilité du fait des produits et de la sécurité des produits

Product liability of online marketplace operators

Current framework and future developments

12 mars 2024
Briefing

par plusieurs auteurs

Cliquer ici pour en savoir plus
Criminalité d’entreprise et conformité

Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 series

8 février 2024
Quick read

par plusieurs auteurs

Cliquer ici pour en savoir plus
Résolution des litiges

What are the litigation trends for 2024?

1 février 2024

par Katie Chandler et Emma Allen

Cliquer ici pour en savoir plus