20 janvier 2022
Disputes Quick Read – 44 de 57 Publications
Disputes Quick Read: Court decisions on the Disclosure Pilot Scheme – the 2021 roundup
We look at key court decisions on the Disclosure Pilot Scheme (DPS) from the past year, as we look forward to another 12 months of the scheme's operation.
The DPS has been operating in the Business and Property Courts since 1 January 2019 and was due to end on 31 December 2021 but has been extended by the 133rd PD Update to 31 December 2022. The scheme was introduced in an attempt to create a more reasonable and proportionate disclosure process. It is governed by Practice Direction 51U (PD 51U). Case law and guidance on the operation of the scheme continues to emerge from the courts and from the Disclosure Working Group.
Below we summarise three cases dealing with control of documents held by third parties and pre-action disclosure.
Pipia v BGEO Group Ltd (formerly known as BGEO Group PLC) [2021] EWHC 86 (Comm)
The court gave further guidance on the meaning of control. The claimant sought disclosure of WhatsApp messages stored on mobile phones of two key individuals residing outside the jurisdiction, who were not parties to the case.
Cockerill J ordered additional Extended Disclosure of WhatsApp messages stored on the mobile phone of one witness, who had previously had a service contract with the defendant which authorised the defendant to access data held on his devices. The second witness had not had a contractual relationship with the defendant, and so his phone was not within the defendant's control. This distinction highlights the need for parties to scrutinise at an early stage employment/service contracts when considering if documents held by third parties are within their control.
The case also highlights the significance of WhatsApp in cases involving bad faith. The judge held that the immediacy of WhatsApp communications was such that they were likely to give the court 'an unguarded picture' of their author's actions and so the 'necessity' threshold, under PD 51U.18, was satisfied.
Various Airfinance Leasing Companies and another v Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation [2021] EWHC 2904 (Comm)
Continuing with the theme of information held on personal devices, the High Court rejected the application that would have required the defendant to disclose documents held on mobile phones of two of its senior personnel.
The defendant argued that it lacked the necessary 'control' as it had no entitlement under Saudi Arabian law to 'possess, inspect, or control or obtain access' to the data held on the personnel's mobile phones. Having considered evidence on the law of Saudi Arabia, the court preferred the conclusion that the documents were not within the defendant's control. As the requirement of 'control' is the basis of both disclosure under CPR 31 and the DPS, the court further held that it could not require a party to exercise best endeavours to obtain or to request a third party to provide the documents.
This judgment is a further reminder for parties to consider early whether documents held by third parties could be deemed within either party's control, and clarifies the position where the relationship is governed by foreign law.
Willow Sports Ltd v SportsLocker24.com Ltd and another [2021] EWHC 2524 (Ch)
This judgment is of interest for the court's approach to pre-action disclosure under CPR 31.16 in a DPS context. The Deputy Master found that the court had jurisdiction to make an order but declined to do so. The Deputy Master held that the request for disclosure was too widely drawn and the court was not 'in a position to undertake the task of attempting to prune it'. Among other things, the Deputy Master noted that:
- given the distrust between the parties there was a real likelihood of the applicant being dissatisfied with any disclosure provided, risking satellite litigation about compliance with the order;
- the applicant sought disclosure to help it decide which cause of action it could pursue. This suggested the applicant was "fishing" to ascertain how to put its case.
The case is an illustration of the difficulties a party will face when seeking pre-action disclosure and a reminder that such applications should be confined to documents that are 'strictly necessary'.
Find out more
To discuss the issues raised in this article in more detail, please reach out to a member of our Disputes & Investigations team.
Dans cette série
Disputes Quick Read: ClientEarth v Shell – climate change litigation shifts focus to UK companies
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: High Court rules that failure to provide adequate data security is not a positive act
Disputes Quick Read: Judicial Review and Courts Bill – unpacking the UK government's proposed amendments
par Stephanie High
Disputes Quick Read: Will litigants be compelled to participate in alternative dispute resolution?
Disputes Quick Read: Freezing injunctions – maximum custodial sentence imposed for breach
Disputes Quick Read: The online future of civil justice – the end of the legal profession or the end of legal drudgery?
par Jessica Thomas
Disputes Quick Read: Will the courts change forever post-COVID?
par David de Ferrars
Disputes Quick Read: One Blackfriars administrators cleared of misfeasance
par Stephen O'Grady
Disputes Quick Read: Not your prerogative – the Independent Review of Administrative Law reports its recommendations on judicial review
par Stephanie High
Disputes Quick Read: Amendments to the Disclosure Pilot Scheme – a step in the right direction
Disputes Quick Read: UK Supreme Court rules on the territorial extent of the SFO's powers
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: No dropping anchor – parent company liability for environmental claims
Disputes Quick Read: What lawyers need to know about new witness statement preparation rules
par Stephanie High
Disputes Quick Read: Should you still choose the English courts to have jurisdiction in your international contracts after Brexit?
par Tim Strong
Disputes Quick Read: Privilege lost in the EU post-Brexit (with exceptions)
Disputes Quick Read: Law on interest applicable to US dollar awards reaffirmed
Disputes Quick Read: Care required when drafting SPA claim notices
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: Why the modernised LCIA rules are a welcome update
par Nick Storrs
Disputes quick read: Mandatory changes to Statements of Truth
par Katie Chandler
Disputes Quick Read: The latest on Unexplained Wealth Orders
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: COVID-19 and supply chain disruption – key issues
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: High Court orders parties to explore options for 5-week remote trial
Disputes Quick Read: Tomlin Orders – ensuring the confidentiality of settlement terms
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: UK's OFSI fines Standard Chartered Bank £20 million for sanctions breaches
par Stephanie High
Disputes Quick Read: A different approach to witness evidence
par James Bryden
Disputes Quick Read: Coronavirus - a growth in virtual courts?
par Stuart Broom
Disputes Quick Read: Embracing remote hearings – the experience to date
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes quick read: climate change activism by litigation
par Tim Strong, Andrew Howell
Disputes Quick Read: Commercial Court's arbitral power shift
par Andrew Howell
Disputes Quick Read: Court stays evictions during COVID-19 – is this lawful?
par Georgina Jones
Disputes Quick Read: Will the civil justice system change forever post COVID-19?
par Georgina Jones
Disputes Quick Read: Privilege waiver warning
par Tim Strong, Georgina Jones
Disputes Quick Read: Retailers reign supreme in Visa and Mastercard proceedings
Disputes Quick Read: Scope of duty and the SAAMCo counterfactual following Manchester Building Society
Disputes Quick Read: Facilitating transactions in cryptoassets - Lord Leggatt and the point of commercial law
par Stuart Broom
Disputes Quick Read: Privy Council clarifies the law on freezing injunctions in aid of foreign proceedings
par Katie Chandler
Disputes Quick Read: Climate change litigation – what's the latest?
par Tim Strong, Jessica Thomas
Disputes Quick Read: Court decisions on the Disclosure Pilot Scheme – the 2021 roundup
par Natalia Faekova
Disputes Quick Read: Assumption of responsibility - tax schemes and investors
Don't lose your keys: Bitcoin developers do not have a duty to assist owners in recovering lost cryptocurrency
Disputes Quick Read: Dealing in crypto? Be careful what you call it
par plusieurs auteurs
Disputes Quick Read: ENRC prevails in claim against former solicitor
Disputes Quick Read: Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 – now in force
par Stephanie High
Disputes Quick Read: what claims exist when a smart contract is breached?
par Emma Allen
Disputes Quick Read: Climate change litigation – successful challenge to government's Net Zero Strategy
Disputes Quick Read: Defining the duty - the limits of the responsibility assumed by professionals
par Stuart Broom
Disputes Quick Read: Disclosure - What information can be redacted?
par Lizzie Hancock
Disputes Quick Read: New gateway for serving Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust orders out of the jurisdiction
Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts
Disputes Quick Read: New obligations on cryptobusinesses to report under the UK sanctions regime
par Nick Maday, Katie Fry-Paul
