6 December 2024
Disputes Quick Read – 1 of 99 Insights
In a very recent decision in Aabar Holdings S.a.r.l v Glencore Plc [2024] EWHC 3046 (Comm), the Commercial Court considered the "Shareholder Rule" established in 19th century case law. This is an exception to the law of privilege that prevented a company from asserting privilege against its own shareholders save in relation to documents that came into existence for the purpose of hostile litigation against a shareholder. The principle was based on the findings in the cases in the 19th century that shareholders had a proprietary interest in the company's assets, including legal advice paid with using company funds. Subsequently it was determined in Saloman v Saloman & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 that a company has a separate legal personality from its shareholders and since that decision there has been a tension between that principle and the Shareholder Rule.
The judge in this decision made two key findings:
This decision is perhaps surprising – although not without its critics, the Shareholder Rule has been regarded as a rule of English law for over a century. It is, however, thoroughly and carefully reasoned. The decision may well impact the ability of shareholders to pursue claims against a company, where access to privileged material belonging to the company may have assisted. For example, we have seen more instances of shareholder activism particularly in the area of climate change (eg ClientEarth v Shell Plc & Others [2023] EWHC 1897 (Ch)). It is also a first instance decision, so ripe for appeal to the higher courts. We therefore expect there to be more developments in this area of the law although it is unclear what view an appeal court would reach.
Please contact the Disputes and Investigations team for more information.
6 December 2024
14 November 2024
14 November 2024
by Emma Allen
30 October 2024
by Multiple authors
15 October 2024
21 March 2024
by Emma Allen, Amy Cheng
14 December 2023
13 December 2023
23 October 2023
by Multiple authors
17 October 2023
12 September 2023
by Tom Charnley
14 August 2023
by Multiple authors
4 August 2023
by Multiple authors
21 July 2023
10 July 2023
1 June 2023
by Multiple authors
3 May 2023
by James Bryden
20 April 2023
by James Bryden
8 March 2023
2 March 2023
14 February 2023
13 February 2023
8 February 2023
19 January 2023
3 October 2022
22 September 2022
by Ben Jones, Emma Allen
9 August 2022
by Nick Maday
25 July 2022
6 July 2022
by Emma Allen
Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts
28 July 2022
27 July 2022
by Stuart Broom
29 July 2022
17 June 2022
13 June 2022
26 May 2022
31 May 2022
by Multiple authors
4 April 2022
5 April 2022
31 March 2022
by Multiple authors
21 September 2021
by Multiple authors
13 September 2021
6 September 2021
2 August 2021
21 July 2021
15 July 2021
by Jess Thomas
26 May 2021
5 May 2021
21 April 2021
31 March 2021
26 February 2021
by Tim Strong
24 February 2021
20 January 2021
12 January 2021
by Tim Strong
23 November 2020
16 October 2020
23 September 2020
7 October 2020
by Nick Storrs
9 April 2020
by Multiple authors
15 April 2020
27 April 2020
by Multiple authors
21 April 2020
11 March 2020
by James Bryden
17 March 2020
by Stuart Broom
26 February 2020
21 February 2020
2 June 2020
16 June 2020
9 July 2020
21 July 2020
3 December 2021
24 November 2021
by Stuart Broom
8 October 2021
10 January 2022
20 January 2022
22 March 2022
7 April 2022
by Tim Strong and Kate Hamblin
by Katie Chandler and Helen Brannigan
by Tim Strong and Kate Hamblin