8 November 2024
Disputes Quick Read – 3 of 98 Insights
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has updated its guidance on the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) – importantly it has made it clear that this is relevant to all NDAs regardless of the context in which the NDA arises. The guidance also makes clear that what is meant by "NDA" is any form of agreement or contract, or a clause within a wider agreement or contract, under which it is agreed that certain information will be kept confidential. This includes agreements with individuals and other commercial parties.
The SRA initially issued a warning notice about the use of NDAs in March 2018. This was in the context of the #MeToo movement and specifically the improper use of NDAs in relation to sexual misconduct which prevented people who had experienced sexual harassment from reporting it to the relevant authorities. It has been updated since then.
The updated guidance provides a reminder of some of the key issues and risks that those dealing with NDAs need to be aware of and the obligations regulated persons have under the general SRA's Code of Conduct. It says it is particularly concerned to ensure that NDAs are not used to prevent reporting to it or to other regulators and enforcement agencies or to prevent disclosures which are protected by law. The guidance states that clauses used must not prevent any such disclosure or give the person expected to agree the NDA the impression that this kind of disclosure is prohibited. This includes other terms in the agreement which might serve to inhibit permitted reporting by way of their operation.
The guidance now has a much broader application and must be considered by anyone regulated by the SRA in whatever situation an NDA (including confidentiality clauses within the context of any wider agreement) is being considered. It will be applicable to in-house lawyers and regulated individuals who manage human resources and complaints in law firms as well as relevant individuals in law firms. It also serves as a reminder to review and update precedents which seek to impose confidentiality obligations on a signatory to ensure they are current and fit for purpose.
The latest guidance is available here.
14 November 2024
14 November 2024
by Emma Allen
30 October 2024
by Multiple authors
15 October 2024
21 March 2024
by Emma Allen, Amy Cheng
14 December 2023
13 December 2023
23 October 2023
by Multiple authors
17 October 2023
12 September 2023
by Tom Charnley
14 August 2023
by Multiple authors
4 August 2023
by Multiple authors
21 July 2023
10 July 2023
1 June 2023
by Multiple authors
3 May 2023
by James Bryden
20 April 2023
by James Bryden
8 March 2023
2 March 2023
14 February 2023
13 February 2023
8 February 2023
19 January 2023
3 October 2022
22 September 2022
by Ben Jones, Emma Allen
9 August 2022
by Nick Maday
25 July 2022
6 July 2022
by Emma Allen
Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts
28 July 2022
27 July 2022
by Stuart Broom
29 July 2022
17 June 2022
13 June 2022
26 May 2022
31 May 2022
by Multiple authors
4 April 2022
5 April 2022
31 March 2022
by Multiple authors
21 September 2021
by Multiple authors
13 September 2021
6 September 2021
2 August 2021
21 July 2021
15 July 2021
by Jess Thomas
26 May 2021
5 May 2021
21 April 2021
31 March 2021
26 February 2021
by Tim Strong
24 February 2021
20 January 2021
12 January 2021
by Tim Strong
23 November 2020
16 October 2020
23 September 2020
7 October 2020
by Nick Storrs
9 April 2020
by Multiple authors
15 April 2020
27 April 2020
by Multiple authors
21 April 2020
11 March 2020
by James Bryden
17 March 2020
by Stuart Broom
26 February 2020
21 February 2020
2 June 2020
16 June 2020
9 July 2020
21 July 2020
3 December 2021
24 November 2021
by Stuart Broom
8 October 2021
10 January 2022
20 January 2022
22 March 2022
7 April 2022