Author

Stephanie High

Senior Associate

Read More
Author

Stephanie High

Senior Associate

Read More

20 January 2021

Disputes Quick Read – 54 of 87 Insights

Disputes Quick Read: What lawyers need to know about new witness statement preparation rules

  • Quick read

The Civil Procedure Rules Committee recently approved changes to the rules regarding the preparation of witness statements which are likely to come into force in April 2021. These changes will affect anyone required to give evidence at trial in the Business and Property Courts and lawyers preparing those witness statements.

The aim of the changes is to stop the process of preparing a statement from altering and influencing the evidence itself. This is a reaction against long statements which are often criticised for containing opinion and argument, and for being over-engineered by the legal process of preparing them.

How should lawyers prepare a witness statement under the new rules?

Under the new rules, lawyers should consider the following when preparing a witness statement:

  • Am I putting open questions to the witness (leading questions are to be avoided)?
  • Can the witness speak to the facts in question personally?
  • Did the witness create or see the relevant documents at the time?
  • How well does the witness recollect the facts in question? What documents does the witness need to see to assist their recollection?
  • Does the statement stay within the parameters of what the witness has told me they recollect?

What do these changes mean for lawyers' existing processes?

The changes mean that lawyers will need to reconsider the processes they have previously used when obtaining evidence from a factual witness, particularly as the legal representative will be required to complete a Certificate of Compliance. This document confirms that the statement has been prepared in accordance with the new rules and that the proper content and proper process of preparation has been discussed with the witness. 

Some of the changes will be controversial – for example, the requirement to produce a list of all the documents seen by a witness – and there will be some practical challenges to complying with the rules. However, the fact that some of the guidance is so granular is indicative of the wish for real substantive change in the process and ultimately the outcome. As ever, there's hope that this will lead to reduced legal costs and more efficient trials.

Find out more

To discuss the new rules for preparing witness statements in more detail, please reach out to a member of our Disputes & Investigation team. 

In this series

Disputes & investigations

New SFO Director announces bold plans to tackle fraud

21 March 2024

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

What are the litigation trends for 2024?

1 February 2024

by Katie Chandler, Emma Allen

Disputes & investigations

ClientEarth v FCA: Challenging Regulator Decisions

12 February 2024

by Tim Strong, Nicole Baldev

Disputes & investigations

First of its kind judicial guidance on the use of AI in the courts

14 December 2023

Disputes & investigations

The use of AI in Trial Witness Statements post-PD 57AC

23 October 2023

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

Failure to prevent fraud – a new offence?

14 August 2023

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

Supreme Court rules that APP fraud victims cannot rely on Quincecare Duty

4 August 2023

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: ClientEarth refused permission to pursue directors of Shell

1 June 2023

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

CJC costs review – what will change?

1 June 2023

by James Bryden, Helen Robinson

Disputes & investigations

Embargoed judgments – dos and don'ts

16 May 2023

by Stephanie High

Cryptoassets, blockchain and distributed ledger technology

Disputes Quick Read: New obligations on cryptobusinesses to report under the UK sanctions regime

9 August 2022

by Nick Maday

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: New gateway for serving Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust orders out of the jurisdiction

Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts

28 July 2022

by Emma Allen, Samantha Brendish

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Care required when drafting SPA claim notices

23 September 2020

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Tomlin Orders – ensuring the confidentiality of settlement terms

27 April 2020

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Commercial Court's arbitral power shift

21 February 2020

by Andrew Howell

Disputes & investigations

Disputes quick read: pilot error?

13 February 2020

by Andrew Howell

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Privilege waiver warning

2 July 2020

by Tim Strong, Georgina Jones

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Dealing in crypto? Be careful what you call it

7 April 2022

by Multiple authors

Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe

Related Insights

Disputes & investigations

Court of Appeal confirms mandatory ADR is here to stay

4 December 2023
Quick read

by Stephanie High and Elizabeth Montpetit

Click here to find out more
Disputes & investigations

Embargoed judgments – dos and don'ts

16 May 2023
Quick read

by Stephanie High

Click here to find out more
Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read - What do practitioners think about making alternative dispute resolution (ADR) compulsory?

8 March 2023
Quick read

by Elizabeth Montpetit and Stephanie High

Click here to find out more