Authors

Andrew Howell

Partner

London

Stuart Broom

Partner

London

Samantha Brendish

Senior Associate

London

Authors

Andrew Howell

Partner

London

Stuart Broom

Partner

London

Samantha Brendish

Senior Associate

London

27 April 2020

Disputes Quick Read – 80 of 101 Insights

Disputes Quick Read: Tomlin Orders – ensuring the confidentiality of settlement terms

QUICK READ

Tomlin Orders are commonly used as a method of staying legal proceedings indefinitely following a settlement, save only for allowing the parties to apply to court to enforce settlement terms without having to commence new proceedings.

The question arises, however, whether the terms of the settlement – often confidential in nature – need to be included as a schedule to the Order and, if they are, whether there is a risk that they will become public if non-parties request access to the file under CPR 5.4C.

In our experience, parties try to avoid this issue in different ways. Some ask that the schedule be placed on the court file in a sealed envelope marked "confidential" and that it is not disclosed under CPR 5.4C without the parties' or court's consent, while others (where the court permits it) do not file the settlement terms at all, but simply refer to the existence of a settlement agreement.

Unfortunately, there is no consistent approach by the courts. The Commercial Court, for example, typically hands back terms following the granting of an Order, even where they are set out in a schedule or an annex. The Queen's Bench Division (QBD) did not adopt that practice.

The recently reported case of Zenith Logistics Services (UK) Ltd and others v Coury [2020] EWHC 774 (QB) highlighted this problem. It was an appeal from a QBD Master's decision not to grant Tomlin Orders with confidential schedules unless the parties could justify why confidentiality was required in accordance with the usual rules. He also declined to grant an Order that did not annex the terms, but simply referred to a settlement agreement that was not placed on the Court file.

Thankfully, the judge on appeal found it to be "entirely unobjectionable" for parties to file an Order referring to, but not setting out, the precise settlement terms. He confirmed – rightly in our view – that the open justice principle does not require parties to make their settlement agreements public. In his view, the QBD should not demand to see a settlement agreement which the parties have designated as confidential (save in certain circumstances, such as where litigants in person were involved) – which would have the effect of bringing its practice closer to that of the Commercial Court.

It must be right that, as a general rule, commercial parties should be permitted to resolve disputes on confidential terms and be confident that non-parties will not subsequently be able to obtain them from court files. Best practice remains to refrain from filing the settlement terms at court where possible.

Services and Groups Disputes & investigations

In this series

Disputes & investigations

Wirral Council v Indivior plc: Court of Appeal upholds strike out of opt-in representative action securities claim

30 January 2025

by Katie Chandler, Samantha Brendish

Disputes & investigations

What are the litigation trends in 2025?

22 January 2025

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

Changes to the privilege rules between companies and shareholders

6 December 2024

by Tim Strong, Helen Brannigan

Environmental, social & governance (ESG)

Victory for energy companies/defeat for the environment?

14 November 2024

by Tim Strong, Kate Hamblin

Disputes & investigations

Failure to prevent fraud offence to come into force in September 2025

14 November 2024

by Emma Allen

Disputes & investigations

Non-Disclosure Agreements - updated guidance from the SRA

8 November 2024

by Edward Spencer

Disputes & investigations

Essex Cricket Club charged by Cricket Regulator

30 October 2024

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

UK introduces mandatory reimbursement rules to combat APP fraud

15 October 2024

by Emma Allen, Andrew Spencer

Disputes & investigations

Important environmental ruling?

16 July 2024

by Tim Strong, Kate Hamblin

Disputes & investigations

Notice of Claim: What constitutes 'reasonable detail'?

5 July 2024

by Stuart Broom, Tom Charnley

Disputes & investigations

Introduction of football regulator on hold for now

24 May 2024

by David de Ferrars, Joe Pengelly

Disputes & investigations

Proposed changes to the rules on ADR

20 May 2024

by Elizabeth Montpetit, Natalia Faekova

Disputes & investigations

Internal investigations - raising the bar

1 May 2024

by Andrew Howell

Disputes & investigations

New SFO Director announces bold plans to tackle fraud

21 March 2024

by Emma Allen, Amy Cheng

Disputes & investigations

What are the litigation trends for 2024?

1 February 2024

by Katie Chandler, Emma Allen

Disputes & investigations

ClientEarth v FCA: Challenging Regulator Decisions

12 February 2024

by Tim Strong, Nicole Baldev

Disputes & investigations

First of its kind judicial guidance on the use of AI in the courts

14 December 2023

Disputes & investigations

Witness familiarisation - does it affect the court's assessment of witness credibility?

13 December 2023

by Tim Strong, Helen Brannigan

Disputes & investigations

Court of Appeal confirms mandatory ADR is here to stay

4 December 2023

by Stephanie High, Elizabeth Montpetit

Disputes & investigations

The use of AI in Trial Witness Statements post-PD 57AC

23 October 2023

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

CAT to hear the first application for a collective settlement approval order

17 October 2023

by Katie Chandler, Samantha Brendish

Disputes & investigations

Law Commission's report on digital assets: what's next?

2 October 2023

by Georgina Jones, Claudia Blofeld

Disputes & investigations

Pre-Action Protocols – what is different?

12 September 2023

by Tom Charnley

Disputes & investigations

Failure to prevent fraud – a new offence?

14 August 2023

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

Supreme Court rules that APP fraud victims cannot rely on Quincecare Duty

4 August 2023

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

The Law Commission's Consultation Process on the Arbitration Act 1996 – taking stock

21 July 2023

by Nick Storrs, Elizabeth Montpetit

Disputes & investigations

What does the latest decision of the CAT in the Mastercard/Visa proceedings mean for class actions?

10 July 2023

by Katie Chandler, Samantha Brendish

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: ClientEarth refused permission to pursue directors of Shell

1 June 2023

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

CJC costs review – what will change?

1 June 2023

by James Bryden, Helen Robinson

Disputes & investigations

Embargoed judgments – dos and don'ts

16 May 2023

by Stephanie High

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read – developments in the fixed costs regime

3 May 2023

by James Bryden

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Service by email – are the rules any clearer?

20 April 2023

by James Bryden

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Breaking the north/south divide?

5 April 2023

by Tom Charnley

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read - What do practitioners think about making alternative dispute resolution (ADR) compulsory?

8 March 2023

by Elizabeth Montpetit, Stephanie High

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: What are the litigation trends for 2023?

2 March 2023

by Katie Chandler, Emma Allen

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: further guidance on witness statement preparation rules

14 February 2023

by Stephanie High, Kate Hamblin

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: A cautionary tale – settlement agreement (un)wittingly releases all claims for fraud

13 February 2023

by Georgina Jones, Ella Bazini

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Why the UK should join the Hague Judgments Convention 2019

8 February 2023

by Jessie Prynne

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: extensive information orders granted against crypto exchanges following hack

19 January 2023

by Georgina Jones

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: A new approach to giving evidence? WhatsApp with that?

3 October 2022

by Gemma Broughall

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Ethereum Merge - what legal issues arise?

22 September 2022

by Ben Jones, Emma Allen

Cryptoassets, blockchain and distributed ledger technology

Disputes Quick Read: New obligations on cryptobusinesses to report under the UK sanctions regime

9 August 2022

by Nick Maday

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Disclosure - What information can be redacted?

25 July 2022

by Edward Spencer

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: what claims exist when a smart contract is breached?

6 July 2022

by Emma Allen

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: New gateway for serving Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust orders out of the jurisdiction

Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts

28 July 2022

by Emma Allen, Samantha Brendish

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Disclosure Pilot Scheme – here to stay

21 July 2022

by Edward Spencer

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Defining the duty - the limits of the responsibility assumed by professionals

27 July 2022

by Stuart Broom

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Climate change litigation – successful challenge to government's Net Zero Strategy

29 July 2022

by Jess Thomas, Lucy Waddicor

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 – now in force

17 June 2022

by Stephanie High

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: an important reminder of the duty to disclose electronic documents in native format

13 June 2022

by Edward Spencer

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: ENRC prevails in claim against former solicitor

26 May 2022

by Emma Allen, David de Ferrars

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Climate change litigation update – McGaughey v Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited

31 May 2022

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

Don't lose your keys: Bitcoin developers do not have a duty to assist owners in recovering lost cryptocurrency

4 April 2022

by Emma Allen, Samantha Brendish

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: The new witness statement preparation rules – a year on

5 April 2022

by Stephanie High

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: ClientEarth v Shell – climate change litigation shifts focus to UK companies

31 March 2022

by Multiple authors

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: High Court rules that failure to provide adequate data security is not a positive act

21 September 2021

by Edward Spencer, Matthew Caskie

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Key changes to the Disclosure Pilot Scheme

13 September 2021

by Edward Spencer

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Judicial Review and Courts Bill – unpacking the UK government's proposed amendments

6 September 2021

by Stephanie High

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Will litigants be compelled to participate in alternative dispute resolution?

2 August 2021

by David de Ferrars, Stephanie High

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Freezing injunctions – maximum custodial sentence imposed for breach

21 July 2021

by Nick Storrs, Georgina Jones

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: The online future of civil justice – the end of the legal profession or the end of legal drudgery?

15 July 2021

by Jess Thomas

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Will the courts change forever post-COVID?

26 May 2021

by David de Ferrars

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: One Blackfriars administrators cleared of misfeasance

5 May 2021

by Stephen O'Grady

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Not your prerogative – the Independent Review of Administrative Law reports its recommendations on judicial review

21 April 2021

by Stephanie High

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Amendments to the Disclosure Pilot Scheme – a step in the right direction

31 March 2021

by Tim Strong, Alexandra Boreham

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: UK Supreme Court rules on the territorial extent of the SFO's powers

26 February 2021

by Tim Strong

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: No dropping anchor – parent company liability for environmental claims

24 February 2021

by Andrew Howell, Jessie Prynne

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: What lawyers need to know about new witness statement preparation rules

20 January 2021

by Stephanie High

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Should you still choose the English courts to have jurisdiction in your international contracts after Brexit?

12 January 2021

by Tim Strong

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Privilege lost in the EU post-Brexit (with exceptions)

23 November 2020

by Andrew Howell, Georgina Jones

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Law on interest applicable to US dollar awards reaffirmed

16 October 2020

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Care required when drafting SPA claim notices

23 September 2020

by Stuart Broom, Samantha Brendish

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Why the modernised LCIA rules are a welcome update

7 October 2020

by Nick Storrs

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: The importance of proper service

26 May 2020

by Edward Spencer

Coronavirus

Disputes Quick Read: government guidance for contracts impacted by COVID-19

12 May 2020

by Andrew Howell, James Bryden

Disputes & investigations

Disputes quick read: Mandatory changes to Statements of Truth

18 May 2020

by Katie Chandler

Disputes & investigations

Disputes Quick Read: The latest on Unexplained Wealth Orders

7 May 2020

by Andrew Howell, Georgina Jones

Coronavirus

Disputes Quick Read: COVID-19 and supply chain disruption – key issues

9 April 2020

by Multiple authors

Coronavirus

Disputes Quick Read: High Court orders parties to explore options for 5-week remote trial

15 April 2020

by Andrew Howell, James Bryden

Disputes & investigations