The Unified Patent Court (UPC) and Unitary Patent have introduced the most radical changes to patent litigation in Europe in 40 years.
The Unified Patent Court (UPC) and the European patent with unitary effect (Unitary Patent) came into full force on 1 June 2023. The Unitary Patent is a new, single pan-European right protecting an invention, which prohibits anyone but the owner or their licensees from practising that invention in all of the participating EU Member States.
As the leading pan-European patent law firm in the UPC, Taylor Wessing has combined its resources from these and other European countries to establish a uniquely adaptable and capable UPC Group to fit exactly the needs of your specific case in the UPC:
Law – we bring knowledge of the key substantive and procedural law traditions that are expected to shape UPC law and practice.
Language – our linguistic skills and the location of our offices ensure that you can be easily represented in the major languages and divisions of the UPC.
Legal skills – our lawyers bring a flexible and complementary mixture of common and civil law experience and skill sets, enabling us to deal with all of the opportunities and challenges that the UPC will bring for you.
UPC judges
Following much speculation, the initial list of legally and technically qualified judges recruited to the UPC has now been announced. We've created an interactive tool to help you navigate through the divisions and find out more about the judges assigned to the courts most relevant to your UPC strategy.Â
Use our toolFor the very first time, after decades of negotiations and many stops and starts along the way, right holders in Europe will get the option to add Unitary Patents to their patent portfolios and also the addition of a single patent litigation system covering the major part of the European market – the UPC.
The Unitary Patent is an independent IP right, which exists in addition to national and European patents and has uniform effect in all participating countries - validation in each country as for European patents is not required.
The procedure for grant is identical to that for the European patents in the European Patent Office (EPO).
Starting in the ‘sunrise period’ and continuing for the seven-year transitional period that begins when the UPC enters into force, a European patent can be permanently opted out from the jurisdiction of the UPC either as an application or a granted patent. The effect of opt-out is to give the national courts exclusive jurisdiction for each respective national validation of a European patent until expiry, just as it would have had without the UPC.
The UPC consists of a Court of First Instance and a Court of Appeal (which includes a Full Court of Appeal for exceptional cases). The Court of First Instance has a central division and numerous regional and local divisions located across the participating countries. While the central division is split between locations, every participating country may set up a local division or – together with one or more other participating countries – a regional division.
According to the current proposal for the fee schedule there are two kinds of fees for using the UPC:
and, additionally, for infringement actions and declarations of non-infringement:
Natural persons and legal entities are entitled to bring an action in all proceedings before the UPC. The patent proprietor of a Unitary Patent or a (non opted-out) European patent as well as the exclusive licensee have the standing to bring infringement actions, provided the licensee informs the proprietor accordingly. A non-exclusive licensee is only entitled to bring an action if the licence agreement expressly permits it.
Infringement and revocation proceedings on the merits before the Court of First Instance consist of a written, an interim, and an oral procedure.
As a basic principle, the burden of the proof of facts is on the party relying on those facts. The burden of proof is reversed however, if a contested product is identical to products derived by the process in suit for obtaining a new product.
A finding of infringement in the UPC may lead to an award of damages or an account of profits, for which a calculation must take all appropriate aspects into account as well as possible moral prejudice.
The UPC does not however provide for punitive damages. Damages awarded on a licence analogy will only be awarded “in appropriate cases”.
Faced with the new system, do you leave your European patents within the jurisdiction of the UPC system, or instead opt them out from it? Considering whether to convert some or all newly European patents into Unitary Patents is also important. There are a number of factors to consider when making these decisions that impact on your business.
Dealing with difficult service in the UPC: An Update
by multiple authors
Jurisdiction and Competence in the UPC Clarified: Decision of the UPC Court of Appeal in Aylo vs. Dish and Sling
by Faziel Abdul
FRAND litigation at the UPC: Disclosure of SEP licences – what do we know so far?
by multiple authors
What is the language of the UPC?
by multiple authors
A look at the Unified Patent Court's first year of operation and what lies ahead
by multiple authors
Enforcement of provisional measures before the UPC
by multiple authors
Please contact one of our experts for more information about our capabilities and expertise. You can also search for a particular individual or see the whole team by using our people finder.
If you hold patents in Europe, the introduction of the UPC will have an impact on your filing strategy. To help you navigate this nuanced system, our international patent law experts have created an introductory guide that outlines the far-reaching changes and addresses the common questions that matter most to your business.