- Home
- News & insights
- Insights
- Balance sheet alloca…
- On this page
11 November 2024
Publication series – 37 of 72 Insights
BGH: Balance sheet allocation of electricity withdrawals at higher voltage levels in the event of supplier failure - recommended action for grid operators
- Briefing
*Update on the decisions of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court of 2 March 2023 (Ref. 5 U 1/22 and 5 U 3/22)
What are the decisions about?
In two decisions dated 17 September 2024 (case no. EnZR 57/23 and EnZR 58/23), the BGH recently ruled on the question of the balance sheet allocation in higher voltage levels in the event of an energy supplier default. On appeal by the plaintiff and the defendant, the BGH amended and revised the respective previous decisions of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court (we reported).
What happened?
In the facts of the cases underlying the decisions, the planned supply to end consumers at the medium-voltage level was no longer possible due to the insolvency of their new electricity supplier. The end consumers then concluded short-term transitional supply contracts with their previous electricity supplier. However, these supply contracts were not registered with the responsible grid operator in good time due to a system error on the part of the supplier. The grid operator then assigned the electricity consumption at the relevant market locations to the balancing group of the local basic and replacement supplier in accordance with the specifications for the low-voltage level. The local basic and replacement supplier invoiced the end consumers for the electricity supplied from the time of allocation. The assessment of these facts by the BGH (preceding: OLG Düsseldorf, decisions of 2 March 2023, 5 U 1/22 and 5 U3/22) was made from two different perspectives in the two sets of proceedings:
- In the proceedings EnZR 57/23, the (old) supplier, which - due to the insolvency-related loss of the new supplier - had concluded transitional supply contracts with the affected end consumers, asserted claims against the network operator (defendant 1) and the locally responsible basic and substitute supplier (defendant 2) for injunctive relief, removal and damages due to the disclosure and use of customer-related data and due to the (in their view) incorrect allocation of the end consumers to the balancing group of the basic and substitute supplier.
- In the proceedings EnZR 58/23, one of the end consumers concerned filed an action against the locally responsible basic and replacement supplier for repayment of the payments already made because of the balance sheet allocation to its balancing group.
Which aspects of the decisions are particularly relevant for network operators?
- An allocation to the substitute supply, as stipulated in Section 38 (1) sentence 1 EnWG for the low-voltage sector, does not apply accordingly to cases of energy procurement at higher voltage levels. The requirements for an analogous application of Section 38 (1) sentence 1 EnWG are not met. There is neither an unintended regulatory gap nor is the situation of interest (special need for protection of household customers) comparable.
- A contract between the end consumer and the default and replacement supplier cannot be established by including informative price sheets in the grid operator’s connection usage contract that refer to a replacement supply by the default and replacement supplier. The BGH left undecided whether an authorisation contained in the general terms and conditions of the network operator to allocate the delivery point of an end consumer to the default and replacement supplier in the event of a supply shortfall is invalid due to a breach of the prohibition of discrimination (Section 20 EnWG), the unbundling regulations (Section 6 EnWG) or the requirement of network neutrality (according to the opinion of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court).
- The principles developed by the BGH in the area of low voltage, according to which the provision of energy represents a real offer by the basic supplier, which is implicitly accepted by the end consumer with the withdrawal, cannot simply be transferred to higher voltage levels. It depends on the circumstances of the individual case whether this actual behaviour (provision and consumption of electricity) can establish a contractual relationship. At higher voltage levels, an implied contract is not concluded by the withdrawal of energy if the end consumer is unaware of the failure of their supplier, or at least does not know who is supplying the electricity (outside of low voltage) and under what conditions. This also includes cases in which the end consumer has already concluded an electricity supply contract with another supplier and therefore had to assume that electricity would be supplied, but this supplier defaults and does not supply in breach of contract. If, on the other hand, there is no contract at all, a legal obligation in the form of management without an order may be considered in the meantime by making the electricity available. This continues to exist until the end consumer becomes aware of the “real offer” in the form of the provision of energy and an implied supply contract is concluded by accepting the electricity supply.
- If an energy supplier fails at the medium-voltage level and there is no contractually agreed replacement supply, a connection block is the last resort. At least for the transitional period required to implement the disconnection, the grid operator must allocate the supply point to the balancing group of the supplier who, from the grid operator’s point of view, is likely to be able to ensure the supply in the short term. Blocking is in line with the specifications of the Federal Network Agency (GPKE 2017, page 42). However, in the opinion of the BGH, an immediate disconnection is not in the interests of the end consumer, who may not be aware of the outage of their supplier. A sudden cap would lead to considerable disadvantages, which is why a cut-off should only take place after a corresponding lead time.
- The grid operator must carry out the allocation on a non-discriminatory basis according to objective criteria. In doing so, it must take account of grid stability, security of supply and the other interests of the end consumers concerned. If there is still a contractual relationship with the previous supplier at the time when the subsequent supplier ceases to exist, the grid operator must allocate the delivery point to this previous supplier beyond the end of the contract. If there is no contractual relationship, the network operator has the right to choose (within the scope of its duty to decide on a non-discriminatory basis according to objective criteria). The default and replacement supplier can also be considered suitable, but not on the basis of its position as a public default supplier, instead only if it fulfils the aforementioned criteria.
- If the balancing group allocation was unlawful due to a breach of the prohibition of discrimination (Section 20 (1) EnWG), the grid operator must correct the incorrect allocation retroactively within the clearing periods if necessary. This also applies - contrary to MaBiS – even if the supplier to whom the delivery point was incorrectly allocated refuses to give its consent.
Checklist to be used in practice:
- Section 38 (1) sentence 1 EnWG does not apply (by analogy) at higher voltage levels.
- A contract between the end consumer and the basic and replacement supplier is not concluded by including informative price sheets in the connection usage contract.
- Whether the conclusion of a contract can be justified by corresponding general terms and conditions remains undecided.
- The principles applicable to low voltage for the implied conclusion of a contract through the provision and consumption of electricity are not transferable to higher voltage levels. Whether a contract is implied depends on the individual case.
- At the “start of the replacement/basic supply” process within the meaning of GPKE, the grid operator must first check whether the market location is at low voltage.
- Only if this is the case will the grid operator (initially) report the market location to the replacement/primary supplier.
- For market locations at higher voltage levels, in the event of a supply shortfall, the grid operator must allocate the delivery point for a transitional period (at least until the blocking is implemented) to the balancing group of the supplier that it believes is likely to be able to secure the supply in the short term.
- If there is still a contractual relationship with the previous supplier at the time of the subsequent supplier’s cancellation, the delivery point must be assigned to this supplier even after the end of this contractual relationship.
- The allocation must be non-discriminatory and based on objective criteria, considering grid stability, security of supply and other interests of the end consumers concerned.
In this series
HR compliance in the energy sector – customs authorities step up the fight against sham-employment
15 December 2025
The Current Challenges for Offshore Wind Energy in Germany
2 December 2025
by Multiple authors
Offshore wind in Germany: from market premiums to Contracts for Difference?
28 November 2025
by Multiple authors
Energy Sharing under Section 42 of the German Energy Industry Act (EnWG)
26 November 2025
Bundestag Decides on the Privileging of Battery Storage Facilities in Outdoor Areas under § 35 (1) BauGB
12 November 2025
Industrial electricity price: Initial assessment and opportunities for companies
21 November 2025
by Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag)
FIDIC – An introduction to the FIDIC Suite 2017
22 October 2025
by Multiple authors
The Renewable Energy Expansion Acceleration Act – a boost for the energy transition in Austria?
23 September 2025
Federal Network Agency discussion paper on reforming grid fees for industry and commerce
25 September 2025
by Multiple authors
German-Dutch Treaty on Cross-Border Energy Projects
18 September 2025
by Multiple authors
Energy communities in Austria and the new Electricity Industry Act (ElWG)
15 September 2025
New amendment to the Energy Industry Act (EnWG) introduced in July and August 2025
8 September 2025
Clean Industrial Deal State Aid Framework (CISAF) – a new state aid framework for the green transformation of industry
8 September 2025
by Dr. Michael Brüggemann, Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag)
Industrial electricity prices: initial assessment and opportunities for businesses
18 August 2025
by Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag), Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
Regulatory Framework for Transmission System Operators in Germany
18 August 2025
by Multiple authors
Court ruling on the effectiveness of availability guarantees for wind turbines
31 July 2025
New Legal Framework for the Commercial Use of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Carbon Capture and Utilisation (CCU)
11 July 2025
by Multiple authors
Are offshore wind converter platforms a bottleneck in the energy transition? New German government wants to create production capacities at German shipyards
17 June 2025
by Multiple authors
Speeding up the energy transition - the new German government’s plans for gas and steam power plants and its quest for the right technology for renewable energy
8 May 2025
by Multiple authors
Update - Change of government opens the door to carbon capture and storage and carbon capture and utilisation
17 April 2025
by Multiple authors
The special fund for infrastructure and climate protection - what is next?
10 April 2025
by Multiple authors
Changes to CBAM through Omnibus legislative package
10 April 2025
The role of heat probes in the energy transition: Authorisation procedures and potential
26 March 2025
CJEU judgement on customer installations in accordance with Section 3 No. 24a Law on the Energy Industry EnWG
26 March 2025
by Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Dr. Christian Ertel
Will the new German government open the door for carbon capture and storage?
26 February 2025
by Multiple authors
Waste heat from data centres - new reporting obligations under the EnEfG
6 February 2025
by Multiple authors
Oman and Belgium Sign Landmark MoU on Green Hydrogen Cooperation
11 December 2024
Decision day: Grid fee exemption in customer systems and energy price brake put to the test
28 November 2024
by Dr. Christian Ertel, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
Hydrogen core network - The Federal Network Agency’s strategy for the energy transition
11 November 2024
by Multiple authors
Amendment to the Energy Industry Act: changes for energy supply companies and grid and system operators
18 September 2024
by Dr. Christian Ertel, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
Standard Essential Patents: A new challenge for the IoT and smart meter world
10 September 2024
Land acquisition and data protection: The importance of the GDPR when project developers request owner data
18 July 2024
by Dr. Patrick Vincent Zurheide, LL.M. (Aberdeen), Dr. Julia Wulff
Municipalities to share profit in wind turbines and ground-mounted photovoltaic systems
11 July 2024
by Multiple authors
Solar Package I - Overview of Changes to Ground-Mounted and Building-Mounted PV Systems
27 May 2024
Mandatory special charge for open space photovoltaic systems in Brandenburg
21 February 2024
by Multiple authors
A new era for wind energy investments in Hungary
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
26 January 2024
Updating the National Hydrogen Strategy
6 November 2023
by Dr. Niels L. Lange, LL.M. (Stellenbosch), Dr. Janina Pochhammer
The new CO2 border adjustment mechanism (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - “CBAM”) - first statutory reporting obligations set for January 2024
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
3 November 2023
New IT security requirements for the energy sector
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
1 September 2023
by Dr. Paul Voigt, Lic. en Derecho, CIPP/E, Alexander Schmalenberger, LL.B.
Does monument protection hinder the expansion of renewable energies?
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
16 August 2023
The amending law to strengthen digitisation in the urban land use planning process and the further expansion of renewable energies
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
6 July 2023
Challenges for data center operators - The federal government’s draft bill for an energy efficiency act
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 April 2023
by Multiple authors
The Energy Charter Treaty in the Light of the Electricity Price Brake: An opportunity for investors to litigate?
27 January 2023
Ordinance for Determining Critical Infrastructures (KritisV): Renewable energy plants as critical infrastructure and requirements for IT protection
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 July 2022
by Dr. Paul Voigt, Lic. en Derecho, CIPP/E, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
Liquefied Natural Gas Projects in Germany: The LNG Acceleration Act
Q&A series: Energy & Infrastructure
10 June 2022
Participation of local municipalities in the context of wind and photovoltaic projects
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
5 May 2022
Renewable Energy Wrap-Up – France
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
27 April 2022
Renewable Energy Wrap-Up - United Kingdom
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
15 March 2022
Building energy performance: the revised Energy Performance of Buildings Directive
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
14 February 2022
Fit for 55 – Hydrogen and the Reform of the European Gas Market
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
11 January 2022
Renewable Energy Wrap-Up – Netherlands
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
2 December 2021
Renewable Energy Wrap-Up – Poland
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
21 September 2021
by Olav Nemling
Renewable Energy Wrap-Up – Austria
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
18 August 2021
Renewable Energy Wrap-Up - Germany
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 July 2021
Floating Foundations for Offshore Wind Farms
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
8 June 2021
Species protection exemption: Significance for wind energy
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
25 May 2021
Power-to-Hydrogen
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
6 April 2021
Focus PV – Floating Solar and Agrivoltaics
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
23 March 2021
Related Insights
Energy Sharing under Section 42 of the German Energy Industry Act (EnWG)
by Fiammetta Kremer and Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
Draft legislation for Market Integration of Storage and Charging Points (MiSpeL) submitted by the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) and its impact on electricity storage
German-Dutch Treaty on Cross-Border Energy Projects
by multiple authors