24 April 2026
Publication series – 2 of 82 Insights
Geothermal energy is increasingly coming into the political spotlight. Whilst the heating sector accounts for the largest share of final energy consumption, the share of renewable energies in heat supply lags significantly behind that of the electricity sector. For instance, the share of renewable energies in gross electricity consumption stood at around 54.4% in 2024, whereas in heat supply it was only around 18.1%. For 2025, the provisional figures stand at 55.1% (electricity) and 19.0% (heat). This highlights the need to make greater use of renewable heat sources which includes geothermal energy. A large proportion of the energy for heat generation still comes from fossil fuels, particularly natural gas and oil. The importance of the heating sector and the need for a transformation of the heat supply are shown by the fact that private households account for the largest share of final energy consumption through heating, which is associated with the release of carbon dioxide.
Geothermal energy utilises the thermal energy stored in the Earth’s crust. A distinction is made between near-surface geothermal energy (up to 400 m depth) and deep geothermal energy (over 400 m depth). This depth distinction is now enshrined in several specialist laws. Technically, this energy is utilised either via open systems (hydrothermal: extraction and return of thermal water) or via closed systems (probe circuit) to provide heat. Where temperatures are sufficiently high, generation of electricity is also possible. In Germany, the water temperatures required for this in practice are around 100°C, which are only reached at greater depths. Depending on the technology, however, lower temperatures can also be utilised, for example in the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) process. The particular advantages of geothermal energy in the heating sector are its independence from weather conditions, its ability to provide base load power, and its comparatively low land requirements. This makes it suitable as a building block of a decarbonised heat supply.
Today, only around two per cent of Germany’s heating demand is met by geothermal energy and ambient heat. There are currently 42 deep geothermal plants in operation in Germany. The majority of these plants tap into geothermal energy via boreholes several thousand metres deep and use it to provide heat. Some of the plants also generate electricity and feed this into the public grid, in some cases in combination with district heating supply. A further 16 plants are currently under construction. Furthermore, the number of exploration licences has risen significantly over the past two years from 82 in January 2023 to 155 projects currently in the planning stage. These projects could provide a heat output of one to two gigawatts in the future and, in some cases, also contribute to electricity generation. The technical and economic potential is considerable, particularly when integrated into local and district heating networks. Favourable geological conditions exist in formations with above-average temperature gradients and exploitable reservoirs. A typical application involves the direct injection of heat into heating networks. Where temperatures are sufficiently high, combined heat and power (CHP) configurations are also possible.
Key challenges include site-specific environmental and operational risks, high exploration and drilling costs, and the risk of non-discovery. The latter refers to the uncertainty as to whether sufficiently productive and hot formation water will be encountered at the target depth. These factors have so far hampered the use of deep geothermal energy despite its potential. Recently, however, regulatory decisions have been made to facilitate expansion.
The development of renewable heat sources is also being driven forward at European level. For instance, the amended Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) sets a binding minimum target of 42.5% renewable energy in gross final energy consumption by 2030, whilst an indicative target of 45% is being pursued. In addition, RED III requires accelerated approval procedures.
With the Geothermal Acceleration Act (GeoBG), which came into force on 23 December 2025, the legislature has created a standalone framework to accelerate the development of geothermal energy, heat pumps, heat storage systems and heat pipelines. The Act affects existing procedures under sector-specific legislation and contains substantive and procedural simplifications. The aim is to simplify and accelerate planning and approval procedures, including their digitalisation, without creating a separate full licence outside the scope of mining and water law.
The regulations function as a set of procedural instruments spanning several areas of law. At the same time, the substantive legal objective – acceleration without compromising groundwater and drinking water protection – is upheld under water law.
Despite the Geothermal Acceleration Act, geothermal projects remain subject to the relevant specialised legislation, in particular mining and water law; no separate full licence is envisaged. As a renewable energy source, however, geothermal energy benefits from the support mechanisms of the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) and is subject to the provisions of the Heat Planning Act and the Building Energy Act, which attribute particular importance to geothermal energy for the heat supply. Together with the procedural simplifications provided by the GeoBG, these standards form the relevant legal framework for the exploration, extraction and integration of geothermal heat into municipal supply networks.
The risk associated with finding a suitable reservoir remains a key economic obstacle. Even with a thorough preliminary survey, there is no guarantee that the reservoir will deliver the expected yield and temperature. The investment risk is correspondingly high, particularly in the case of costly dual-well drilling, i.e. pairs consisting of a production well and an injection well. Whilst the EEG feed-in tariff for geothermal electricity, the CHP surcharges for CHP configurations and the federal funding for efficient heating networks (BEW) address operational viability, they do not address the risk of non-discovery during the drilling phase.
The ‘KfW Geothermal Subsidy Loan’ (Programme 572), which has been available since December 2025, is a new financing instrument designed to close this gap. Up to €25 million can be provided per drilling project as a low-interest loan. Coverage is provided through a combination of geothermal success insurance from Munich Re (30–70% of the loan amount) and a KfW partial debt waiver for the uninsured portion in the event of a claim. This effectively allows the drilling phase to be covered up to 100%. Insurability is assessed on a project-by-project basis prior to application. Only if the outcome is positive is an invitation to apply issued via a financing partner. In addition, the BEW facilitates investment support for grid infrastructure and the integration of renewable heat sources. This is of central importance for the uptake of geothermal heat.
At the procedural level, the GeoBG addresses typical project hurdles to increase predictability and reduce coordination costs. The planning law privileges in rural areas also facilitate site selection without overriding nature conservation requirements.
Furthermore, when distributing heat from geothermal sources, the general rules of the AVBFernwärmeV must be observed, particularly where the heat is distributed as district heating under general supply conditions. Of particular relevance are transparency obligations regarding contractual terms, pricing regulations, metering/billing, contract duration and termination, as well as the technical and economic obligations in the connection and supply relationship.
In practical terms, this means that pricing and the service/billing logic must be clearly defined, transparent and contractually valid. Geothermal energy as a heat source therefore does not alter the applicable contractual requirements; the decisive factor is that heat is supplied within the framework of a district heating supply relationship. Consequently, geothermal energy providers must consider not only the technical and energy-economic project structure but also the contractual structure under district heating law.
According to the information available, the revised draft of the AVBFernwärmeV currently under discussion primarily expands information obligations and revises regulations regarding the adjustment of heat output. Of particular relevance are greater transparency regarding prices, price indexation formulas, network losses and other network data, as well as the incorporation of existing consumption recording and billing rules into the AVBFernwärmeV. Furthermore, customers are to be able to adjust the contractually agreed heat output more easily in future; in the event of significant reductions and when switching to renewable energies, a more extensive right to adjust or terminate the contract is to apply.
For geothermal projects, whose heat is classified as renewable, it is also relevant that the debate on the treatment of renewable heat networks has not yet been conclusively resolved in the draft; some associations are calling for greater preferential treatment for networks with a high proportion of renewable heat. The same applies to the currently planned amendment to the former Building Energy Act (now the Building Modernisation Act), the resulting heat planning by local authorities, and the hitherto highly controversial requirement for a 65% share of renewables when installing new heating systems.
Whether deep geothermal energy becomes a cornerstone of heat supply in Germany depends on whether the combination of procedural acceleration (GeoBG), economic risk mitigation – for example through the KfW 572 programme – and targeted heat planning (WPG) ensures that the project pipeline is filled rapidly and projects can actually be realised. The EU legal framework (RED III) sets ambitious targets and requires efficient approval procedures, which are transposed into national law by the GeoBG.
At the same time, some questions remain unanswered: there is currently a lack of systematic exploration and provision of geological data, but this would significantly improve the suitability assessment within the framework of heat planning. Furthermore, the specialist literature discusses a further reduction in the administrative burden of the licensing regime, such as giving mining law decisions greater precedence over water law. Finally, it is important to strengthen acceptance of geothermal projects through transparent communication about risks and benefits, as well as through local participation.
The current legal framework opens up a window of opportunity that should be used by project developers, local authorities and investors. Three areas of action are of particular importance here:
24 April 2026
by Multiple authors
24 April 2026
by Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag), Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
10 March 2026
by Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Dr. Christian Ertel
18 February 2026
11 February 2026
by Dr. Janina Pochhammer, Dr. Niels L. Lange, LL.M. (Stellenbosch)
14 January 2026
19 December 2025
15 December 2025
2 December 2025
by Multiple authors
28 November 2025
by Multiple authors
26 November 2025
12 November 2025
21 November 2025
by Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag)
22 October 2025
by Multiple authors
23 September 2025
25 September 2025
by Multiple authors
18 September 2025
by Multiple authors
15 September 2025
8 September 2025
8 September 2025
by Dr. Michael Brüggemann, Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag)
18 August 2025
by Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag), Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
18 August 2025
by Multiple authors
31 July 2025
11 July 2025
by Multiple authors
17 June 2025
by Multiple authors
8 May 2025
by Multiple authors
17 April 2025
by Multiple authors
10 April 2025
by Multiple authors
10 April 2025
26 March 2025
26 March 2025
by Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Dr. Christian Ertel
26 February 2025
by Multiple authors
6 February 2025
by Multiple authors
11 December 2024
28 November 2024
by Dr. Christian Ertel, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
11 November 2024
by Multiple authors
18 September 2024
by Dr. Christian Ertel, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
10 September 2024
18 July 2024
by Dr. Patrick Vincent Zurheide, LL.M. (Aberdeen), Dr. Julia Wulff
11 July 2024
27 May 2024
21 February 2024
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
26 January 2024
6 November 2023
by Dr. Niels L. Lange, LL.M. (Stellenbosch), Dr. Janina Pochhammer
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
3 November 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
1 September 2023
by Dr. Paul Voigt, Lic. en Derecho, CIPP/E, Alexander Schmalenberger, LL.B.
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
16 August 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
6 July 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 April 2023
by Multiple authors
27 January 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 July 2022
by Dr. Paul Voigt, Lic. en Derecho, CIPP/E, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
Q&A series: Energy & Infrastructure
10 June 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
5 May 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
27 April 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
15 March 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
14 February 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
11 January 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
2 December 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
21 September 2021
by Olav Nemling
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
18 August 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 July 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
8 June 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
25 May 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
6 April 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
23 March 2021
by multiple authors
Opportunities for non-EU Companies
by multiple authors
by Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham) and Dr. Christian Ertel