作者

Andrew Howell

合伙人

Read More

Georgina Jones

高级律师

Read More
作者

Andrew Howell

合伙人

Read More

Georgina Jones

高级律师

Read More

2020年5月7日

Disputes Quick Read – 62 / 86 观点

Disputes Quick Read: The latest on Unexplained Wealth Orders

  • QUICK READ

When Unexplained Wealth Orders (UWO) were introduced, legal commentators pondered whether the legislation was another idle threat to bolster the government's announcements that we must clamp down on businesses using off shore accounts and overseas investment funds purchasing UK property portfolios in an attempt to avoiding paying tax.

In reality, the National Crime Agency (NCA) has primarily targeted wealthy families. 

Once made the subject of an order, an individual is required by the authorities to provide a detailed account of how they came to own an asset, shifting the burden of proof away from authorities. In short, individuals are required to prove the legitimacy of their assets or risk forfeiting them.

To obtain an UWO, the enforcement agency must establish that there is property worth in excess of £50,000 (or a number of properties to that cumulative value) owned by an individual who is either politically exposed, suspected of having committed a serious crime or is someone "connected" to a person suspected of such – a very low bar indeed.  

Zamira Hajiyeva, "the woman who spent £16m at Harrods", was the first subject of a UWO. This order was challenged but ultimately upheld by the High Court, representing an early victory for the NCA. Buoyed by the win, the NCA then set their sights on Kazakh Nurali Aliyev and his mother Dariga Nazarbayeva, High Net Worth political individuals based in Kazakhstan. 

Having obtained the UWOs, the NCA's success was short lived as, on 8 April 2020, the High Court handed down a damming judgment stating the NCA had proceeded on "unreliable evidence". The key principle of the ruling was that the use of off-shore structures, while demonstrative, is not conclusive evidence of criminal property. 

While this gives private client lawyers and their clients a bit of breathing space, we doubt the NCA will be discouraged by the ruling. It will, however, require the NCA to think twice before chasing the low hanging fruit by simply targeting any offshore structure. As for lawyers, we must continue to scrutinise and challenge "evidence" the NCA presents against our clients. 

 

本系列内容

纠纷和调查

What are the litigation trends for 2024?

2024年2月1日

作者 Katie Chandler, Emma Allen

纠纷和调查

The use of AI in Trial Witness Statements post-PD 57AC

2023年10月23日

作者 作者

纠纷和调查

Failure to prevent fraud – a new offence?

2023年8月14日

作者 作者

纠纷和调查

CJC costs review – what will change?

2023年6月1日

作者 James Bryden, Helen Robinson

纠纷和调查

Embargoed judgments – dos and don'ts

2023年5月16日

作者 Stephanie High

加密资产、区块链和分布式账本技术

Disputes Quick Read: New obligations on cryptobusinesses to report under the UK sanctions regime

2022年8月9日

作者 Nick Maday

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: New gateway for serving Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust orders out of the jurisdiction

Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts

2022年7月28日

作者 Emma Allen, Samantha Brendish

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: Care required when drafting SPA claim notices

2020年9月23日

作者 作者

纠纷和调查

Disputes quick read: pilot error?

2020年2月13日

作者 Andrew Howell

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: Dealing in crypto? Be careful what you call it

2022年4月7日

作者 作者

Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe