作者

Andrew Howell

合伙人

Read More

James Bryden

高级法律顾问

Read More
作者

Andrew Howell

合伙人

Read More

James Bryden

高级法律顾问

Read More

2020年4月15日

Disputes Quick Read – 64 / 86 观点

Disputes Quick Read: High Court orders parties to explore options for 5-week remote trial

  • QUICK READ

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, we are seeing the UK courts grappling with various applications to adjourn upcoming trials. So far, it seems that the courts are willing to embrace remote hearings to avoid adjournments – not only for simple cases, but also complex disputes. We think this is the right approach.

In a decision handed down recently, the High Court ordered the parties to a £250m claim listed for a 5-week trial in June – which involves four live witnesses of fact and 13 expert witnesses – to cooperate in exploring ways in which the case could be heard in a fully remote trial.

The claimants had sought to have the claim adjourned, arguing (among other things) that the technological challenge was too great. The judge was not convinced. He noted that since 16 March 2020, there have been at least two examples of fully remote trials taking place (albeit on smaller scales) and the technological challenges were not so great as to make it appropriate to adjourn now.

The judge emphasised that cooperation and planning was essential if a remote trial was going to be possible, and that he would expect any proposed system to be subjected to robust testing first, both to ensure adequate video and audio quality, and also to confirm that documents could be displayed quickly.

We welcome the court's approach. Complex commercial cases can take many years to reach trial, and the court and the litigants should cooperate to explore options in scenarios where adjournment can potentially be avoided through a remote hearing. Live trials will ordinarily be much preferred, but it will be interesting to see whether remote hearings remain a procedural option once the pandemic has run its course.

本系列内容

纠纷和调查

What are the litigation trends for 2024?

2024年2月1日

作者 Katie Chandler, Emma Allen

纠纷和调查

The use of AI in Trial Witness Statements post-PD 57AC

2023年10月23日

作者 作者

纠纷和调查

Failure to prevent fraud – a new offence?

2023年8月14日

作者 作者

纠纷和调查

CJC costs review – what will change?

2023年6月1日

作者 James Bryden, Helen Robinson

纠纷和调查

Embargoed judgments – dos and don'ts

2023年5月16日

作者 Stephanie High

加密资产、区块链和分布式账本技术

Disputes Quick Read: New obligations on cryptobusinesses to report under the UK sanctions regime

2022年8月9日

作者 Nick Maday

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: New gateway for serving Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust orders out of the jurisdiction

Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts

2022年7月28日

作者 Emma Allen, Samantha Brendish

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: Care required when drafting SPA claim notices

2020年9月23日

作者 作者

纠纷和调查

Disputes quick read: pilot error?

2020年2月13日

作者 Andrew Howell

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: Dealing in crypto? Be careful what you call it

2022年4月7日

作者 作者

Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe

Related Insights

纠纷和调查

The use of AI in Trial Witness Statements post-PD 57AC

2023年10月23日
Quick read

作者

点击此处了解更多
纠纷和调查

CJC costs review – what will change?

2023年6月1日
Quick read

作者 James Bryden 以及 Helen Robinson

点击此处了解更多
纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read – developments in the fixed costs regime

2023年5月3日
Quick read

作者 James Bryden

点击此处了解更多