作者

Andrew Howell

合伙人

Read More

Laurence Lieberman

合伙人

Read More

Stuart Broom

高级法律顾问

Read More
作者

Andrew Howell

合伙人

Read More

Laurence Lieberman

合伙人

Read More

Stuart Broom

高级法律顾问

Read More

2020年3月26日

Disputes Quick Read – 11 / 20 观点

Disputes Quick Read: Embracing remote hearings – the experience to date

  • QUICK READ

There is (understandably) a deluge of guidance being issued on a daily basis by the various courts which are grappling with the practical impact of COVID-19 on the operation of the justice system.

The courts have, it seems, embraced the adoption of technology to resolve disputes, be that conference calls or video conferences over Skype, Zoom or similar applications. All judicial laptops now have Skype for Business enabled.

On 25 March 2020, the Supreme Court issued its first judgment remotely – giving us a fine view of what we assume to be Lord Justice Kerr's private collection of law reports – and in a well-publicised success in the family courts, Mostyn J completed a five party final hearing with evidence from 11 witnesses and the press attending remotely.

While there have been some teething problems (and these will no doubt continue) the direction of travel is clear. Discretion ultimately resides with the judiciary regarding how or whether a hearing should proceed, but they and the parties have shown a willingness to cooperate and to facilitate remote hearings.

When faced with adjourning a trial last week, Teare J reportedly commented that the default position is that hearings should be conducted with one or more participants attending remotely, the court should take an optimistic approach to how this will work, and it is the duty of all parties to seek to co-operate. That must be the right approach in these difficult times.

The protocol for remote hearings in the civil justice system (published on 20 March 2020) sets out some practical steps. It encourages parties to take a proactive approach to forthcoming hearings, hold short directions hearings (if necessary) to discuss and agree how best to use the technology, and prepare and file electronic bundles.

A new practice direction (51Y) was issued on 25 March 2020, providing further guidance on video or audio hearings during the pandemic, dealing largely with privacy aspects of remote hearings.

As experience grows, guidance can be fine-tuned. In the meantime, parties and the judiciary should continue to work together to find practical solutions, often backed by technology, to the operational problems caused by the current outbreak.

本系列内容

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: The latest on Unexplained Wealth Orders

QUICK READ

作者 作者

Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe

Related Insights

tunnel
纠纷和调查

FRC's Annual Enforcement Review 2020 – our thoughts

2020年8月11日
IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS

作者 Andrew Howell 以及 Georgina Jones

点击此处了解更多
pipette
Synapse

Arbitration for life sciences companies

2020年6月29日
IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS

作者

点击此处了解更多
venn-diagram-people
新冠病毒

Disputes Quick Read: government guidance for contracts impacted by COVID-19

2020年5月12日
QUICK READ

作者 Andrew Howell 以及 James Bryden

点击此处了解更多