- Home
- News & insights
- Insights
- Important environmental ruling?
2024年7月16日
Disputes Quick Read – 7 / 99 观点
Important environmental ruling?
- Quick read
Hot off the back of our article on climate change litigation developments in the first half of 2024 (which you can read about here), the second half of 2024 starts with a highly anticipated ruling on private waterway owners affected by sewage discharges. We assess its impact.
The case
This was an appeal to the Supreme Court, which was asked to determine whether the Manchester Ship Canal Company, as owner of the beds and banks of the relevant canal, could bring a common law claim in nuisance or trespass against United Utilities Water Ltd in relation to their discharges of foul water from the sewage network into the canal. United Utilities argued that Manchester Canal could not bring such an action as the Water Industry Act 1991 excluded common law rights of action and nuisance. The case was a question of statutory interpretation.
The Supreme Court held that the 1991 Act did not prevent Manchester Canal from bringing a claim in nuisance or trespass. As an organisation which exercises statutory powers, United Utilities could be liable for such actions unless it was acting within its statutory powers, or had been granted statutory immunity.
As to the first point, the Supreme Court held that the 1991 Act does not expressly or impliedly authorise United Utilities to cause a nuisance/trespass by discharging foul water into the canal. As to the second point, the Supreme Court found that Parliament did not intend the 1991 Act to prevent a claimant from enforcing its common law rights. The 1991 Act is a consolidating statute and so was intended principally to restate rather than amend the law and in the circumstances, it was clear that there had been a common law claim in nuisance for hundreds of years. There was also nothing in the 1991 Act that indicated that Parliament intended to remove that common law right when the law was consolidated, and there were indications that Parliament had intended that common law rights be retained.
Impact
This case is very significant for private waterway owners affected by sewage discharges. It may embolden claimants, leading to a surge in similar cases, particularly as water companies across the country have faced immense scrutiny in relation to waste discharge in recent years, and one factor the Supreme Court took into account was that United Utilities could take steps to reduce and prevent such discharges.
However, its impact will be limited to the water industry only. The case was about a specific statutory interpretation issue in relation to the 1991 Act and the judges followed the usual approach to such statute-based cases: their judgment focuses on assessing parliament's intention and they do not appear to have been influenced by wider environmental public policy concerns. Whilst undoubtedly significant, therefore, as a measure of the impact of climate and sustainability litigation more generally, it is of limited value.
本系列内容
Failure to prevent fraud offence to come into force in September 2025
2024年11月14日
作者 Emma Allen
Disputes Quick Read: ClientEarth refused permission to pursue directors of Shell
2023年6月1日
作者 作者
Disputes Quick Read: Ethereum Merge - what legal issues arise?
2022年9月22日
作者 Ben Jones, Emma Allen
Disputes Quick Read: New obligations on cryptobusinesses to report under the UK sanctions regime
2022年8月9日
作者 Nick Maday
Disputes Quick Read: New gateway for serving Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust orders out of the jurisdiction
Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts
2022年7月28日
Disputes Quick Read: Why the modernised LCIA rules are a welcome update
2020年10月7日
作者 Nick Storrs
Disputes Quick Read: Tomlin Orders – ensuring the confidentiality of settlement terms
2020年4月27日
作者 作者
Related Insights
Climate change litigation update – developments so far in 2024
作者 Tim Strong 以及 Kate Hamblin
Disputes Quick Read: ClientEarth refused permission to pursue directors of Shell
作者
Climate change litigation update – ClientEarth issues claim against Shell's directors
作者