作者

David de Ferrars

合伙人

Read More
作者

David de Ferrars

合伙人

Read More

2021年5月26日

Disputes Quick Read – 48 / 87 观点

Disputes Quick Read: Will the courts change forever post-COVID?

  • Quick read

Much has been reported about the success of remote hearings and how the measures taken by courts during the pandemic will impact how they operate in the future.

There is certainly support at the highest levels of our judiciary for using the experiences of COVID-19 to accelerate a digital court system. Speaking at the recent London International Disputes Week, the Right Hon. Sir Geoffrey Vos noted how important it is for the courts to bring processes online. 

This goes beyond using remote hearing platforms and electronic bundles. It means moving to a truly integrated online system, including using artificial intelligence and smart programming to suggest resolutions (although not to determine outcomes). The ambition will be to increase access to justice by allowing individuals to bring claims at a proportionate cost and without undue delay – but will online dispute resolution ultimately replace the physical courts entirely?

Are all cases a good fit for the remote hearing approach?

Inevitably, there are those cases which are too difficult to be resolved through a more automated online process.

Sir Julian Flaux spoke at the recent Civil Justice Conference about the importance of building on the positive changes brought about by COVID-19. While acknowledging that some hearings lend themselves to being conducted remotely, he also recognised that a remote hearing had "its price" including having a robust infrastructure and balancing the impact on workloads across the judiciary.

Another important issue is the extent to which witnesses should be permitted to give evidence remotely, and Sir Julian suggested that some guidance for judges would be helpful. He also stressed the importance of retaining the authority and formality of the court and achieving open access for all in all forms of hearings.

Could virtual and physical courtrooms co-exist?

Interestingly, the minutes of a recent Commercial Court user group meeting recorded that "in-court trial remains the gold standard". The minutes further stated that the court is looking to return to in-court trials – although this doesn't necessarily mean that all hearings will be held in a physical courtroom.

So, while COVID-19 has accelerated change and it's now unlikely that all hearings will be held in a courtroom, you can expect in-person hearings to continue to be an essential part of the justice process.

Find out more

To discuss the issues raised in this article in more detail, please reach out to a member of our Disputes & Investigations team.

本系列内容

纠纷和调查

New SFO Director announces bold plans to tackle fraud

2024年3月21日

作者 作者

纠纷和调查

What are the litigation trends for 2024?

2024年2月1日

作者 Katie Chandler, Emma Allen

纠纷和调查

The use of AI in Trial Witness Statements post-PD 57AC

2023年10月23日

作者 作者

纠纷和调查

Failure to prevent fraud – a new offence?

2023年8月14日

作者 作者

纠纷和调查

CJC costs review – what will change?

2023年6月1日

作者 James Bryden, Helen Robinson

纠纷和调查

Embargoed judgments – dos and don'ts

2023年5月16日

作者 Stephanie High

加密资产、区块链和分布式账本技术

Disputes Quick Read: New obligations on cryptobusinesses to report under the UK sanctions regime

2022年8月9日

作者 Nick Maday

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: New gateway for serving Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust orders out of the jurisdiction

Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts

2022年7月28日

作者 Emma Allen, Samantha Brendish

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: Care required when drafting SPA claim notices

2020年9月23日

作者 作者

纠纷和调查

Disputes quick read: pilot error?

2020年2月13日

作者 Andrew Howell

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: Dealing in crypto? Be careful what you call it

2022年4月7日

作者 作者

Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe