Employment law is dynamic and we are lawyers who understand the rapidly-changing world of human resources. We tackle “people problems” creatively, from every angle, knowing the delicate nature of employment issues which often create the most important decisions a company has to take. Our aim is to make the law work for you, not against you. We will take developing and intellectual legal concepts and apply them pragmatically, with a touch of common sense, to create workable business principles.
We cover all aspects of employment law – from advisory and transactional matters to contentious issues, and have specialists who understand the challenges of key industries such as TMC, life sciences, banking and financial services, energy, transportation and so on. Our clients range from public to private sector employers, from multinational groups to small companies and a whole range of trustees. We also regularly act for C-suite and senior executives on a variety of complex matters.
A Japanese electronics conglomerate on providing ongoing employment law advice in various projects, including reconciliation of interest in the context of the shutdown of the business unit.
An international car rental company on providing comprehensive employment law advisory in M&A-projects as well as regarding ongoing matters in recruitment and HR management
A large European airline on providing ongoing and comprehensive employment law advice in several European countries, including in contentious matters as well as immigration.
An international freight forwarding and logistics group offering global air and sea freight services on provision of ongoing employment advice.
A Korean OEM on providing comprehensive employment law advice in Germany and France, also regarding the reformation of a European works council and several workers agreements.
Actualités et publications récentes
Employment Rights Act 2025: Upcoming changes and their effect on current working practices
par Kathryn Clapp
FCA publishes final guidance in non-financial misconduct
par Shireen Shaikh
Collective redundancy: EAT clarifies the meaning of proposing 20 or more redundancies in 90 days (Micro Focus Ltd v Mildenhall)
Discrimination: Stonewall did not cause or induce discrimination against barrister (CA)
par Shireen Shaikh
Whistleblowing: Employees can pursue dual claims for automatic unfair and detriment
par Mark Rose