10 septembre 2024
Publication series – 35 de 66 Publications
The smart meter rollout is an example of the digital transformation of the energy sector. A digital communication network is spread over the electricity, gas, and water infrastructure. Smart meters, gateways and control devices use communication standards (such as WLAN, 5G, etc.) for system integration.
These communication standards are based on technology that is often patented. As a result, a licence market worth billions has developed for patent holders for mobile communication standards such as LTE: Large patent holders and patent exploiters have already discovered the smart grid as a source of income and have started to demand licence payments from device manufacturers and infrastructure operators.
Manufacturers and users of IoT and smart meter devices are therefore facing the challenge of defending themselves against excessive licence demands from patent holders. Right from the start of the legal tug-of-war, it is important to prevent the formation and consolidation of unfavourable licensing levels through active resistance.
The digitalisation is transforming infrastructures of electricity, gas, and water (e.g., Internet of Things, IoT). A variety of wired and wireless communication technologies are being used for this (e.g. LTE, WLAN or M-Bus standards), some of which originate from the classic mobile communications sector and are now being rolled out to various industrial sectors.
However, the use of standards from communications technology does not eliminate the risk of this technology infringing third-party patents. On the contrary: patent holders file their patent applications during and after the standardisation process with the aim of including as much patented technology as possible as part of a standard therefore making the use of the standard dependent on the patented technical solution being used; the patent then becomes standard essential (also known as “SEP” for “standard essential patent”), meaning the standard cannot be used without using the patent. In the last decade, the number of declared SEPs has risen exponentially from 12,191 to 72,300, including many patents with effect in Germany: With regard to the 4G standard, around 57% of the SEP-declared patent families had effect in Germany in 2022; in the area of 5G, too, more than 50% of the patent families had effect in Germany.
Patent owners can assert a claim for injunctive relief against the users of their patented technology. In principle, a patent holder is free to choose which (and how many) participants in a commercial supply chain it acts against for patent infringement.
In the case of a smart meter, for example, the smart meter manufacturer, the radio module supplier (and sub-suppliers), the smart meter retailer and the commercial user (such as a municipal utility company) are potentially liable for patent infringement. Experience has shown that it is primarily the end device manufacturers and users who are the focus of the patent holders, because a higher licence fee can be demanded here due to the end sales price. However, it can be assumed that the patent holders will also turn to other market participants.
A patent holder’s claim for injunctive relief can cause considerable economic damage. This monopoly and exclusivity for patent proprietors are justified in cases where there is no standardisation of the patented technology and no conflict with antitrust and competition law. However, with a view to equal access to standardised technology, case law generally grants SEPs a right to a so-called compulsory licence, known as FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory) conditions, as a defence against a claim for injunctive relief by the patent proprietor.
Whether and which licence conditions (especially which royalty) are in fact FRAND depends on the individual case. Although case law has developed basic principles and rules of conduct for both parties in this regard, this is often decided by disputes in and out of court between the patent proprietor and the implementer.
In February 2024, the European Parliament adopted a draft regulation on SEPs, on which the European Council must now decide. While this draft has been met with exceptionally clear and broad criticism, it will not ultimately shift the cornerstones of the conflict of interest outlined above.
In the meantime, patent owners are using the German legal system - which is generally considered to be more patent owner-friendly - to enforce their licence claims through lawsuits and warnings. The new Unified Patent Court (UPC) system, whose judgements (with injunctions) can be enforced in all participating states (currently 17 countries), is exacerbating the situation for implementers. SEP holders have already filed various lawsuits with this court, which was only established in 2023.
In the meantime, major SEP exploiters have launched special programmes to generate licensing income in the IoT and smart meter sector. Whether the licence fees demanded by SEP holders correspond to the FRAND level owed is rarely determined by courts and usually by way of negotiation. The implementer is then faced with the decision to accept the - possibly excessive - offer of the patent holder or to negotiate lower licence fees, which may involve going to court. Judgments handed down in practice, show that the defence generally leads to lower royalty rates.
par plusieurs auteurs
22 octobre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
23 septembre 2025
par Sabine Meister
25 septembre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
18 septembre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
15 septembre 2025
8 septembre 2025
8 septembre 2025
par Dr. Michael Brüggemann, Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag)
18 août 2025
par Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag), Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
18 août 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
31 juillet 2025
11 juillet 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
17 juin 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
8 mai 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
17 avril 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
10 avril 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
10 avril 2025
26 mars 2025
26 mars 2025
par Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Dr. Christian Ertel
26 février 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
6 février 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
11 décembre 2024
11 décembre 2024
28 novembre 2024
par Dr. Christian Ertel, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
11 novembre 2024
11 novembre 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
18 septembre 2024
par Dr. Christian Ertel, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
10 septembre 2024
18 juillet 2024
par Dr. Patrick Vincent Zurheide, LL.M. (Aberdeen), Dr. Julia Wulff
11 juillet 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
27 mai 2024
21 février 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
26 janvier 2024
6 novembre 2023
par Dr. Niels L. Lange, LL.M. (Stellenbosch), Dr. Janina Pochhammer
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
3 novembre 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
1 septembre 2023
par Dr. Paul Voigt, Lic. en Derecho, CIPP/E, Alexander Schmalenberger, LL.B.
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
16 août 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
6 juillet 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 avril 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
27 janvier 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 juillet 2022
par Dr. Paul Voigt, Lic. en Derecho, CIPP/E, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
Q&A series: Energy & Infrastructure
10 juin 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
5 mai 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
27 avril 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
15 mars 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
14 février 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
11 janvier 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
2 décembre 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
21 septembre 2021
par Olav Nemling
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
18 août 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 juillet 2021
par Carsten Bartholl
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
8 juin 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
25 mai 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
6 avril 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
23 mars 2021
General overview of the sanctions regime and explaination what companies need to do now
par plusieurs auteurs
par plusieurs auteurs