2 mai 2024
Work/Life – 27 de 123 Publications
Welcome to the latest edition of our international employment news update.
Our strategic alliance with leading Spanish law firm ECIJA means clients looking to do business in Spain, Portugal and Latin America are supported by one of the best multidisciplinary law firms in the legal sector with a well-established reputation for innovation and success. Furthermore, this alliance enriches our newsletter as ECIJA regularly contributes insightful content, broadening our insight on legal matters.
(you may require a subscription to view some of these articles).
An Employment Tribunal has ruled that the expression 'back in your day' directed at senior colleagues could constitute age-related harassment. This term, which highlights generational differences, might be considered as "unwanted conduct" and possibly objectionable. This ruling surfaced during the case of Margaret Couperthwaite; a nursing assistant who pursued an age harassment claim after her younger colleague's purported remark about NHS operations being complimentary 'back in your day'. Despite the dismissal of the claim due to insubstantial evidence, the tribunal acknowledged that had such a comment been made, it would have pertained to age and likely regarded as unwanted conduct. Alongside this, Ms Couperthwaite's additional allegations involving discriminatory termination, disability discrimination, and harassment were also rejected.
A group of Tesco staff members have escalated their dispute to the UK Supreme Court, challenging the retailer's 'fire and rehire' approach. They claim that in 2009 they were either dismissed or coerced into relocating 40 miles away. Although Tesco compensated individuals who consented to move with a lump sum, the firm later sought to terminate their employment in 2021 and offer re-employment under less beneficial terms. Tesco won at an earlier appeal stage, which overturned a previous ruling preventing the dismissals. The Supreme Court heard the appeal on 23 and 24 April 2024, and the judgment is currently pending.
In the recent judgment 457/2024, the Supreme Court upheld that a company may require its security staff to wear ties in air-conditioned settings. This ruling aligns with an existing agreement with trade unions which permits the company to define the security guards' uniforms, ensuring they are seasonally suitable, functional for work, and considerate of personal circumstances. The decision supports the company's right to enforce a dress code, confirming that it does not infringe upon employee dignity and supports gender equality in uniform design and application.
On 24 April 2024, France enacted a new law in line with EU legislation allowing employees to accrue paid leave during sick or accident-related absence, up to 24 days annually, or 30 for work-related incidents. Employers must inform returning staff within a month about their leave entitlement and usage window, extending up to 15 months post-return or from the close of the accrual period if sick leave exceeds a year. Effective since 1 December 2009, this law permits current employees until 23 April 2026 to claim past due leave. For former employees seeking back payment for such leave, claims are subject to a three-year statute of limitations. Employers should assess the retrospective financial obligations arising from these changes.
In the Netherlands, the effective retirement age is nearing 66 years, according to Statistics Netherlands (CBS). This rise corresponds with the gradual increase of the state pension age since 2013. Last year, a majority (74%) of retirees were aged 65 or above, compared to only 14% in 2003, following a decline in early retirement scheme availability after 2006. While the number of pensioners grew significantly in 2020 and 2021, it levelled off around 3.3 million by 2022 and 2023. Despite overall population growth driven by immigration, retirees represent a decreasing proportion (now at 18.3%) of the Dutch populace, partly due to higher labour participation among older adults.
Inspectors from the Ministry of Social Affairs have informed parliament that penalties for hiring non-EU workers without appropriate documentation are failing to deter employers, as fines have not kept pace with inflation. Currently capped at EUR8,000 per violation since 2005, these sanctions would be EUR15,000 today if adjusted for inflation according to the inspectors' analysis. Employers still see a financial gain by employing individuals illegally, even after being fined. An examination of 24 cases revealed that employers could reduce their expenses by up to 60%, implying that the cost savings far outweigh any incurred fines. For instance, an owner of an Asian eatery paid a cook EUR1,000 in cash monthly for extensive working hours but saved EUR38,000 by not paying formal wages or related employment costs. Similar scenarios occurred in industries like cleaning services, construction work, shipbuilding, and agriculture. It was noted that 90% of employers recouped their fine within one year, with some doing so in under three months.
During a statement in Beijing, the Hungarian Foreign Affairs and Trade Minister proclaimed that investments from Chinese enterprises amounting to EUR15.2 billion will be channelled into Hungary's economy, with the anticipation of creating around 25,000 job opportunities and elevating the country's technological standards.
The Slovak government are in the process of amending the Act on Foreigners' Residence to align with European Union guidelines and to streamline the immigration path for non-EU workers. This legislative revision is set to enhance the availability of EU blue cards for highly qualified individuals from outside the EU. Regarding standard work permits, under the proposed changes, non-EU nationals would be eligible to commence employment in Slovakia as soon as they file their application with immigration police, on the condition that the relevant labour office has already approved that a non-EU national can fill the vacancy.
The European Union's Court of Justice has delivered a ruling that Poland did not fulfil its obligation to implement the EU directive on whistleblower protection into domestic law. Consequently, Poland is subject to financial sanctions comprising a one-time payment of EUR7 million coupled with daily fines amounting to EUR40,000 commencing from the verdict's declaration date. The original deadline was set for 17 December 2021; however, the European Commission identified Poland's non-compliance and initiated legal proceedings before the Court. The Court sustained the Commission’s allegations, dismissing Poland’s justifications related to legislative delays and extraordinary circumstances such as the health crisis and refugee surges. Accordingly, Poland has been mandated by the Court to pay both the fixed sum and daily penalties as stipulated by the Commission.
On 24 April 2024, the Polish Parliament referred the whistleblower protection bill for its initial reading to the Committee on Social Policy and Family. The committee has until 20 May 2024 to complete their report on the bill.
6 novembre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
23 octobre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
9 octobre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
24 septembre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
23 juin 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
22 mai 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
24 avril 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
10 avril 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
27 mars 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
13 mars 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
13 février 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
30 janvier 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
16 janvier 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
12 décembre 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
28 novembre 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
14 novembre 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
31 octobre 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
17 octobre 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
5 septembre 2024
8 février 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
25 janvier 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
11 janvier 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
14 décembre 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
30 novembre 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
16 novembre 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
2 novembre 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
20 octobre 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
5 octobre 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
21 septembre 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
7 septembre 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
27 juillet 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
11 juillet 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
29 juin 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
15 juin 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
1 juin 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
18 mai 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
3 mai 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
19 avril 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
6 avril 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
23 mars 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
23 février 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
9 février 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
26 janvier 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
12 janvier 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
8 décembre 2022
par plusieurs auteurs
17 novembre 2022
par plusieurs auteurs
3 novembre 2022
par plusieurs auteurs
21 octobre 2022
par plusieurs auteurs
22 septembre 2022
Issue 39
24 septembre 2021
Issue 34
1 juillet 2021
Issue 33
17 juin 2021
Issue 32
3 juin 2021
Issue 31
20 mai 2021
Issue 30
5 mai 2021
Issue 29
22 avril 2021
Issue 28
8 avril 2021
Issue 27
25 mars 2021
Issue 26
10 mars 2021
Issue 25
24 février 2021
Issue 24
11 février 2021
Issue 23
27 janvier 2021
Issue 22
14 janvier 2021
Issue 21
17 décembre 2020
Issue 20
3 décembre 2020
Issue 19
19 novembre 2020
Issue 18
4 novembre 2020
Issue 17
23 octobre 2020
Issue 16
8 octobre 2020
Issue 15
24 septembre 2020
Issue 14
10 septembre 2020
Issue 13
6 août 2020
Issue 12
16 juillet 2020
Issue 11
25 juin 2020
Issue 10
11 juin 2020
Issue 9
28 mai 2020
Issue 8
14 mai 2020
Issue 7
30 avril 2020
Issue 5
25 mars 2020
Issue 4
12 mai 2020
Issue 3
27 janvier 2020
Issue 2
13 février 2020
Issue 1
27 février 2020
par plusieurs auteurs
par plusieurs auteurs
par plusieurs auteurs