15 January 2026
Work/Life – 1 of 125 Insights
Welcome to the latest edition of our international employment news update.
In this edition we look at:
Our strategic alliance with leading Spanish law firm ECIJA means clients looking to do business in Spain, Portugal and Latin America are supported by one of the best multidisciplinary law firms in the legal sector with a well-established reputation for innovation and success. Furthermore, this alliance enriches our newsletter as ECIJA regularly contributes insightful content, broadening our insight on legal matters.
(you may require a subscription to view some of these articles).
The UK Government has dramatically revised down its impact assessment of the Employment Rights Act, cutting the estimated annual business cost from £5 billion to £1 billion. The flagship legislation, which received Royal Assent last month following protracted House of Lords negotiations, introduces sweeping reforms to zero-hour contracts, fire-and-rehire practices, paternity leave, statutory sick pay, and unfair dismissal compensation and qualifying periods.
Ministers attribute the reduced estimate to phased implementation and refined evidence gathering: critics argue that the figure reflects significant government concessions during parliamentary passage. Opposition MPs have repeatedly cited the £5 billion projection as proof that the reforms would harm British enterprise.
The £1 billion estimate primarily captures administrative costs rather than long-term business model impacts, which are difficult to quantify. The government describes the anticipated cost as a 'modest increase' against a backdrop of the UK's total employment costs of £1.4 trillion.
The Employment Rights Act will pile thousands of additional cases onto an already overstretched tribunal system, according to newly published government analysis. The new legislation cuts the qualifying period for unfair dismissal claims from two years to six months and removes the cap on compensation entirely.
These reforms are projected to generate 21,000 extra early conciliation notifications to Acas, 6,900 more employment tribunal cases, and 1,300 additional cases requiring judicial time annually, all of which represents a 17% overall increase. The anticipated surge arrives at a critical moment. The tribunal backlog has reached unprecedented levels, with 52,000 open cases as at Q3 2025, a 33% year-on-year increase surpassing the previous 2020/2021 peak. Many cases take over a year to come to hearing.
The US labour market ended 2025 on a subdued note, with employers adding just 50,000 jobs in December, significantly undershooting economist expectations and marking the weakest performance since the Covid-19 pandemic.
The December figure caps a challenging year for US job creation, with employers adding an average of 49,000 roles monthly throughout 2025, down sharply from 168,000 per month in 2024. However, the unemployment rate unexpectedly fell to 4.4%, reflecting a structural labour shortage as the American workforce shrinks alongside cooling recruitment.
The slowdown unfolds against President Trump's significant policy shifts, including tariffs, immigration restrictions, and government spending cuts. Experts have suggested that the market has entered a "low-hire, low-fire" equilibrium that may shape the economic landscape for 2026.
The Czech Republic has introduced significant improvements to its unemployment benefit scheme, increasing initial support levels to 80% of previous earnings and extending eligibility periods based on a claimant's age. Workers under 52 will now receive benefits for up to five months, whilst those aged 52-57 qualify for eight months of support. Claimants over the age of 57 can access benefits for up to 11 months. The reforms also enhance support for individuals undertaking retraining programmes, raising their benefits to 80% of the national average wage.
Authorities have abolished reduced benefit rates previously applied to workers who voluntary left employment. Under the new system, benefit entitlement depends solely on age rather than the circumstances surrounding job departure. These changes represent a substantial expansion of the Czech social safety net, providing enhanced financial security for job seekers whilst encouraging workforce retraining and skills development
With all eyes on the passing of the Employment Rights Act at the close of 2025, the government has quietly published of a working paper proposing significant reforms to non-compete clauses in employment contracts. Framed as measures to boost labour market dynamism and innovation, the proposals could fundamentally reshape the balance between competitive protection and employee mobility.
Non-competes currently affect approximately five million workers in the UK. Whilst they must protect legitimate business interests and extend no further than is reasonably necessary to be enforceable, the government argues that they may unnecessarily restrict worker movement and stifle entrepreneurship.
The consultation therefore explores five alternative models, including a statutory duration cap of three months, varying the cap by company size, banning non-competes entirely, prohibiting them below a salary threshold of £125,140, or combining salary thresholds with duration limits.
The consultation is open for responses until 18 February 2026.
The Czech Republic has amended its Labour Code to enhance work-life balance protections, making it easier for parents of young children to combine employment with caring responsibilities and return earlier from parental leave. The reforms strengthen employees' rights to request flexible working arrangements, reduced hours, and remote working options, whilst also bolstering protections for workers with caring responsibilities more broadly.
The changes leave existing maternity, paternity and parental leave entitlements unchanged, focusing instead on facilitating smoother transitions between work and family life. The reforms reflect the growing recognition across European jurisdictions that supporting working parents benefits labour market participation whilst also helping employers to retain experienced staff.
An employment tribunal has awarded £450,000 to a senior NHS director after finding he was unfairly dismissed and subject to race discrimination following a fundamentally flawed disciplinary process. In its judgment, the tribunal criticised the Trust's investigation for failing to interview key witnesses, relying heavily on historic allegations, and ignoring extensive contradictory documentary evidence.
Employment advisers have emphasised that common employer failings include delayed responses, investigatory bias, inadequate documentation, and taking actions beyond investigation report recommendations. This case underscores the importance of prompt and impartial investigations, independent oversight, regular training, and robust disciplinary policies.
15 January 2026
by Multiple authors
8 December 2025
by Multiple authors
6 November 2025
by Multiple authors
23 October 2025
by Multiple authors
9 October 2025
by Multiple authors
24 September 2025
by Multiple authors
23 June 2025
by Multiple authors
22 May 2025
by Multiple authors
24 April 2025
by Multiple authors
10 April 2025
by Multiple authors
27 March 2025
by Multiple authors
13 March 2025
by Multiple authors
13 February 2025
by Multiple authors
30 January 2025
by Multiple authors
16 January 2025
by Multiple authors
12 December 2024
by Multiple authors
28 November 2024
by Multiple authors
14 November 2024
by Multiple authors
31 October 2024
by Multiple authors
17 October 2024
by Multiple authors
8 February 2024
by Multiple authors
25 January 2024
by Multiple authors
11 January 2024
by Multiple authors
14 December 2023
by Multiple authors
30 November 2023
by Multiple authors
16 November 2023
by Multiple authors
2 November 2023
by Multiple authors
20 October 2023
by Multiple authors
5 October 2023
by Multiple authors
21 September 2023
by Multiple authors
7 September 2023
by Multiple authors
27 July 2023
by Multiple authors
11 July 2023
by Multiple authors
29 June 2023
by Multiple authors
15 June 2023
by Multiple authors
1 June 2023
by Multiple authors
18 May 2023
by Multiple authors
3 May 2023
by Multiple authors
19 April 2023
by Multiple authors
6 April 2023
by Multiple authors
23 March 2023
by Multiple authors
23 February 2023
by Multiple authors
9 February 2023
by Multiple authors
26 January 2023
by Multiple authors
12 January 2023
by Multiple authors
8 December 2022
by Multiple authors
17 November 2022
by Multiple authors
3 November 2022
by Multiple authors
21 October 2022
by Multiple authors
Issue 39
24 September 2021
Issue 34
1 July 2021
Issue 33
17 June 2021
Issue 32
3 June 2021
Issue 31
20 May 2021
Issue 29
22 April 2021
Issue 28
8 April 2021
Issue 27
25 March 2021
Issue 26
10 March 2021
Issue 25
24 February 2021
Issue 24
11 February 2021
Issue 23
27 January 2021
Issue 22
14 January 2021
Issue 21
17 December 2020
Issue 20
3 December 2020
Issue 19
19 November 2020
Issue 18
4 November 2020
Issue 17
23 October 2020
Issue 16
8 October 2020
Issue 15
24 September 2020
Issue 14
10 September 2020
Issue 13
6 August 2020
Issue 12
16 July 2020
Issue 11
25 June 2020
Issue 10
11 June 2020
Issue 7
30 April 2020
Issue 5
25 March 2020
Issue 3
27 January 2020
Issue 2
13 February 2020
Issue 1
27 February 2020
by multiple authors
by multiple authors
by multiple authors