Authors
Louise Jennings

Louise Jennings

Professional Support Lawyer

Read More
Kate Hamblin

Kate Hamblin

Trainee Solicitor

Authors
Louise Jennings

Louise Jennings

Professional Support Lawyer

Read More
Kate Hamblin

Kate Hamblin

Trainee Solicitor

5 August 2022

R&I Update - August 2022 – 4 of 7 Insights

UK court rejects junior creditors' challenge to administrators' sale of luxury properties

  • Quick read

In Re Swiss Cottage [2022] EWHC 1495 (Ch), junior creditors argued that administrators appointed to two companies had exceeded their powers and breached their duties when selling two properties. 

Background 

Administrators were appointed to the companies in October 2013. They engaged estate agents to sell the companies' assets, two luxury properties in London. The properties were sold for a combined total of around £62 million. The primary secured funder of the companies received the whole of their principal amount. The junior creditors received nothing. They argued that the administrators had exceeded their powers in certain contractual arrangements and had breached their duties by ignoring junior creditors' interests and following an inadequate marketing strategy.

Decision 

  • The administrators did not exceed their powers as the contracts did not ignore the statutory limitations on administrators or the actions required for completion to take place. 
  • The administrators lacked care including confusing the junior creditors' identities and various shortcomings in the statement of proposals. However, the technical deficiencies in the administrators' conduct did not cause loss to the junior creditors. 
  • The properties had been sold for their market value or for the best price reasonably achievable. 
  • The junior creditors would not have acted differently had the administrations been conducted appropriately. 

Key takeaways

The courts are reluctant to interfere with the commercial decisions of officeholders that are properly made. In this case:

  • The administrators were entitled to rely on the professional advice of the agents that the properties had been properly marketed. 
  • The technical deficiencies in their conduct did not have "serious consequences" and the "passive" junior creditors would not have contributed further funding to create a longer marketing period and a different outcome.

Find out more

To discuss the issues raised in this article in more detail, please contact a member of our Restructuring & Insolvency team.

 
Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe

Related Insights

Safe deposit boxes
Restructuring & insolvency

UK court crams down tax authority in first of its kind restructuring plan for an SME

5 August 2022
Quick read

by Louise Jennings and Kate Hamblin

Click here to find out more
Close-Up Of Magnifying Glass
Restructuring & insolvency

Disputes Quick Read: UK government consults on potential new cross-border Model Laws

18 July 2022

by Stephen O'Grady and Kate Hamblin

Click here to find out more
Large Silver Pipes Stacked
Restructuring & insolvency

UK government consults on special administration regime for systemically important stablecoins

7 July 2022
Quick read

by Stephen O'Grady and Louise Jennings

Click here to find out more