作者

Helen Farr

合伙人

Read More
Shireen Shaikh

Shireen Shaikh

高级专业支持律师

Read More
作者

Helen Farr

合伙人

Read More
Shireen Shaikh

Shireen Shaikh

高级专业支持律师

Read More

16 九月 2020

Law at Work - September 2020 – 1 / 5 观点

Contemplating redundancies as furlough scheme ends

  • QUICK READ

When the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme comes to an end on 31 October 2020, there is likely to be a wave of redundancies (or indeed a second wave).

If 20 or more dismissals are proposed over a 90-day period, collective consultation obligations will be triggered. Collective redundancy consultation requires careful project management at the best of times so that timelines are not missed and communications within the business are kept joined up. However, this will be even more challenging to get right in a pandemic situation.

First, there is the challenge of consulting remotely and secondly, the pandemic is a unique situation which affects every employee differently. Any redundancy proposal and discussion of possible alternatives may give rise to more individual 'case by case' discussions and considerations than usual. In turn this can affect timescales and finality of process.

Remote consultation is new for most businesses. Key points are to:

  • ensure you can securely and regularly communicate with employees
  • obtain an up to date email address, which the employee can access regularly
  • make sure employees are given information in good time before any remote consultation meetings that will need to take place, whether online or on the phone
  • if using an online portal make sure it is secure and compliant for data protection purposes
  • keep good notes of meetings so that there is a record.
  • If employees refuse to engage, keep records of the attempts to consult so that employees cannot allege that they were excluded from the process.

There are some questions that arise about the relationship between furlough and redundancy. Initially there was some ambiguity about whether an employee could be consulted with whilst on furlough but it seems likely, from the latest Treasury Direction, that this is permitted and that representatives are allowed to undertake duties for consultation purposes without this being classed as 'work'.

If redundancies cannot be avoided, is it unfair to make employees redundant when furlough is available? There is an argument that it is unfair to make employees for whom the furlough scheme is available redundant, almost drawing parallels with situations where there is 'suitable alternative employment'. The point has not been tested but the fairness of any redundancy dismissal does depend on all the circumstances available at the time and so this is only one factor. Now that employers have to make a higher contribution towards the wage costs of those on furlough this may be a reason why employers have no option but to consider redundancies.

The rules on calculating a redundancy payment changed on 31 July 2020 for those on furlough. A week’s pay for calculating a redundancy payment is based on the rate of a normal week’s pay rather than the rate they are paid during furlough. For those on zero hour contracts, redundancy payments are calculated based on the average rate of a week’s pay earned in the last 12 weeks they worked. The furlough grant cannot be used to pay for an employee’s statutory redundancy payment.

The wellbeing of employees going through the redundancy process should not be overlooked. The combined effect of the pandemic, lockdown and uncertain financial position serves to increase the stress that employees who are going through this process feel. Particular care should be taken to ensure that employees are properly supported and are aware that there is a channel through which they can raise questions or discuss concerns. Taking steps to support employees and follow a proper process is likely not only to reduce claims from disgruntled employees but should also minimise any reputational damage.

本系列内容

就业、养老金和流动性

Contemplating redundancies as furlough scheme ends

QUICK READ

作者 Helen Farr, Shireen Shaikh

就业、养老金和流动性

Does an employer’s duty of care extend to commuting?

QUICK READ

作者 Helen Farr

就业、养老金和流动性

Employment hot topics

September 2020

QUICK READ

作者 Kathryn Clapp, Shireen Shaikh

Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe

Related Insights

people walking
就业、养老金和流动性

New Government Job Support Scheme

24 九月 2020
QUICK READ

作者 Paul Callaghan 以及 Shireen Shaikh

点击此处了解更多
business people talking
雇佣

Dismissal without following a prior process following a breakdown in the employment relationship was found to be fair

Gallacher v Abellio Scotrail Ltd

16 九月 2020
QUICK READ

作者 Shireen Shaikh

点击此处了解更多
meeting with laptop
就业、养老金和流动性

COVID-19 and health testing

15 七月 2020

作者 Helen Farr

点击此处了解更多