Author
Nick Moser

Nick Moser

Partner

Read More
Author
Nick Moser

Nick Moser

Partner

Read More

7 January 2021

R&I update - January 2021 – 2 of 4 Insights

Lenders – remember to obtain all necessary consents before taking enforcement action

  • Quick read

In Arlington Infrastructure Ltd (In administration) and another v Woolrych and others [2020] EWHC 3123 (Ch), the Court considered the meaning of a deed of priority entered into between the senior and junior secured creditors of Arlington Infrastructure Limited (AIL). The junior creditors (but not the senior creditor) also held debentures over AIL's subsidiary companies.

The deed of priority provided that the junior creditors wouldn't take any step to enforce any security interest (including over the subsidiaries) without the prior written consent of the senior creditors. Without seeking prior consent, the junior creditors purported to appoint administrators over the subsidiaries.

The senior creditors applied to challenge the validity of that appointment on the grounds that – without the necessary consent (which would not be granted) – the junior creditors' floating charge was not "enforceable" under Paragraph 16 of Schedule B1 Insolvency Act 1986.

The decision 

  • The Court agreed with the senior creditors. It found that the meaning of "enforceable" should be considered objectively and involves consideration of "all the circumstances including the terms of the debenture or other security document between the parties, any collateral contract or agreement, whether between the parties or between the floating chargeholder and a third party, any promise against enforcement, and any statutory provision."
  • The charge was not enforceable because the contractual notice required under the deed of priority had not been given. The junior creditor's right to appoint administrators had not, therefore, arisen and the appointment was invalid.

Key takeaway

This decision demonstrates the importance of a secured creditor reviewing all security documentation (as broadly defined above) and obtaining any consents required under the terms of any intercreditor arrangements before taking enforcement action. To discuss the decision in more detail, please reach out to a member of our Restructuring & Insolvency team.

Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe

Related Insights

2012-000731 BANR TW Website ARTICLE THUMBNAIL Pension report
Pensions insolvency

Pensions in Restructuring Survey – our analysis

14 January 2021
Quick read

by Mark Smith and Nick Moser

Click here to find out more
Highrise office buildings facade
Restructuring & insolvency

English High Court provides clarity for assignees of insolvency claims

7 January 2021
Quick read

by Nick Moser

Click here to find out more
Meeting in conference room
Restructuring & insolvency

Reintroduction of UK tax authority preferential claim – how could it affect you?

10 December 2020
Quick read

by Nick Moser

Click here to find out more