David predominantly focuses on multi jurisdiction patent cases and matters with both an intellectual property rights and competition law aspects.
He heads our China group in the Benelux and advises Chinese companies on the legal aspects of their business activities in the Netherlands. David’s work covers the entire range of intellectual property law, and while he specialises in multi-jurisdictional patent litigation, he also regularly acts in matters related to competition law and public procurement law. David provides clients with both sound advice on procedural law and useful insights in the judiciary.
显示完整简历
隐藏完整简历
更多
更少
职业发展
| Since 2018 | Lawyer, Taylor Wessing |
| 2015 – 2018 | Lawyer, BarentsKrans |
| 2013 – 2015 | Court Clerk, Court of Appeal of The Hague |
| 2010 – 2013 | Court Clerk, District Court of Zeeland-West-Brabant |
教育
| 2015 | LL.M. Dutch Law, Erasmus University, Rotterdam |
| 2014 | Exchange program, China University of Political Sciences and Law, Beijing |
| 2012 | LL.B. Dutch Law, Erasmus University, Rotterdam |
Publications
From "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" to "Show and Tell", European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR 2019, 41) Articles on FRAND in the Mededingingsrecht in de Praktijk (MP 2017, 201) and on National Patent Litigation in The Netherlands in les Nouvelles, Journal of the Licensing Executives Society, Volume LIII No. 4, December 2018 Comment on the judgment of the District Court of The Hague of 2 November 2018 (Tomra v Kiremko), ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2018:5609, Berichten Industriële Eigendom (BIE 2019, 1) Wanneer is er sprake van FRAND? Huawei/ZTE in de nationale rechtspraktijk (Tijdschrift Mededingingsrecht in de Praktijk) Moet de geldigheid van IE-rechten worden betrokken bij inzage-vorderingen ex art. 843a Rv.?, annotation on the judgment of the Court of Appeal of The Hague of 28 June 2016, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2016:1734: Comment on the judgment of the Court of Appeal of The Hague of 28 June 2016 (Plantlab v Certhon), ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2016:1734, Berichten Industriële Eigendom (BIE 2016, 42) Comment on the judgment of the European Court of Justice of 16 April 2015, C-446/12, C-447/12 and C-448/12 (biometric data in passports) in Jurisprudentie Bescherming van persoonsgegevens, January 2016 Biometrische gegevens op paspoort, annotation on the judgment of the European Court of Justice of 16 April 2015, C 446/12, C 447/12, C 448/12, C 449/12 |
语言
| English |
| Dutch |
最新新闻和观点
专利与创新
点击此处了解更多
Sisvel v Xiaomi et al - Court of Appeal of The Hague
2020年6月24日
IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS
作者 David Mulder
酒店与休闲
点击此处了解更多
The Bolar and related exemptions in Europe
What activity do they cover?
2020年3月5日
作者
