作者

Rona Westgate

Senior Knowledge Lawyer

Read More
作者

Rona Westgate

Senior Knowledge Lawyer

Read More

2019年6月10日

UK Government to pay for replacement cladding

On 9 May 2019, the UK Government confirmed that it will allocate £200 million to allow privately-owned high rise buildings to speed up the replacement of unsafe aluminium composite (ACM) cladding.

Private owners of high-rise buildings will have three months to apply for funding, but the Government does expect the owners to use reasonable steps to re-coup the costs from those responsible (or their insurers) for the installation of the cladding.

Repairs to social housing blocks have had the benefit of a £400 million fund.

Some private landlords have already "done the right thing" as the Government has been calling on them to do and undertaken replacement works at their cost.

Some leaseholders whose properties benefit from insurance-backed guarantees, like the NHBC, have also been reassured that the NHBC will contribute to the costs of replacement cladding. There are also examples where the original developer has been persuaded to pay for cladding replacement.

However, other landlords have taken the view that the costs can legitimately be passed on to leaseholders. Most tenancy arrangements place the obligation on the landlord to maintain the exterior and common parts.

There will usually be a corresponding obligation for the tenants to pay for such maintenance costs through the service charge arrangements. Some tenants have argued that the replacement of unsafe cladding goes beyond "maintenance", meaning that the costs cannot be passed through the service charge.

But most service charge provisions also allow the landlord to recover the cost of rectifying "inherent defects" in the building, which arguably extends to unsafe cladding.

Even if the "inherent defects" argument failed, a landlord is likely to argue that the cladding replacement is required under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 – and most service charges allow for the recovery of costs incurred in complying with fire regulations.

The potential avenue for leaseholders to claim against the developer under the Defective Premises Act 1972 has brought hope to some who are faced with a large cladding bill – but this claim must be brought within six years of completion of the building.

Given these complexities, the Government's announcement is good news for leaseholders. But private owners must apply for the funding promptly – and ultimately, the buck may simply be passed to cladding contractors, and their insurers.

Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe

Related Insights

房地产

Building Safety Act regime transition 6 April deadline

2024年3月28日
Quick read

作者 Rona Westgate 以及 Matthew Jones

点击此处了解更多
房地产

The Building Safety Act 2022

Higher-risk buildings (HRBs)

2023年12月1日

作者

点击此处了解更多
房地产与建筑业

Update on the Building Safety Act and transition to the new regime

2023年8月23日
Quick read

作者 Matthew Jones 以及 Rona Westgate

点击此处了解更多