作者
Paul England

Paul England, DPhil

高级专业支持律师

Read More
作者
Paul England

Paul England, DPhil

高级专业支持律师

Read More

2018年1月8日

Inventive step in Europe and the UPC

January 22, 2018: Paul England: „Inventive step in Europe and the UPC"

Abstract
The author
Paul England PhD is a senior associate and senior professional support lawyer in the IP/IT group of Taylor Wessing, London, specializing in patents.

This article

  • The essential question that must be asked by a national court in Europe, when deciding a dispute about inventive step is ‘is the invention obvious?’, as required by Article 56 EPC. However, the approaches taken by these courts to answering this question differ.
  • The reason is that the question can be addressed in many ways, using different sub-tests and guiding factors. The proposed solution to resolving this inconsistency is the Unified Patent Court (UPC).
  • This article examines the key approaches and sub-tests employed in the major centres of European patent litigation—the EPO, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK—when attempting to answer the question ‘is the invention obvious?’. It assesses what common ground there is between them that may guide the future UPC.
Call To Action Arrow Image

Latest insights in your inbox

Subscribe to newsletters on topics relevant to you.

Subscribe
Subscribe

Related Insights

专利与创新

Pharmaceutical patent law in times of crisis: A comparative study – Part 1

2020年11月9日
Quick read

作者

点击此处了解更多
petri dishes
专利与创新

COVID-19 and public compulsory licensing of drugs in Europe

2020年4月17日
IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS

作者

点击此处了解更多
酒店与休闲

Synapse - November 2019

2019年11月26日

作者

点击此处了解更多